User talk:BrandonT0421

BrandonT0421, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. CCamp2013 (talk) 03:33, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. CCamp2013 (talk) 18:31, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Hello Brandon. If you continue to add puffery to contestant descriptions without making any attempt to respond to the criticisms of your work you may be blocked for edit warring. This is your chance to clear your name. EdJohnston (talk) 03:15, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Hello Ed, I have not added any puffery recently, I have just added things such as the show Porsha Williams hosts and the show Kyle Richards stars on. From what I understand, this is not puffery. Please clear my confusion as to why "The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills" star or "Dish Nation" co-host is puffery. BrandonT0421 (talk) 15:18, June 10 2016 (ET)
 * According to User:CCamp2013, it is not necessary to include so much information in those lists. Per the argument at Talk:The New Celebrity Apprentice:  "The occupational description should be concise and not content awards". I am not familiar with these practices but you should not try to unilaterally change what is usually done. I recommend proposing your changes on the respective talk pages to see if others agree with you. EdJohnston (talk) 21:57, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Hello Ed, I will no longer continue to change anything out of community standards. Please let others know.Thank you. BrandonT0421 (talk) 13:09, June 12 1016 (ET)

Warned per the edit warring complaint
See Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 02:39, 12 June 2016 (UTC)