User talk:Brandon K.

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Here at Wikipedia we strive to achieve a neutral point of view by presenting disputes as they are and the evidence as it is. As such, the creation of an article which inherently adheres to one point of view in such an argument, such as your recent submission "Evidence for creation", cannot be accepted into Wikipedia. However, in the future after reading some of the guidelines that we have about Neutral point of view, we certainly welcome your submissions and encourage you to keep on editing and contributing. Thanks again, and happy editing, --Kuzaar-T-C- 13:16, 16 June 2006 (UTC) Also, here's the old template message for creationist POV editors:

Evolution
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contribution. We realise that evolution is a controversial topic in the United States and in some other places in the world.

Many of the arguments presented by proponents of creationism or intelligent design have been presented to this page repeatedly. Generally, these arguments are based on a misunderstanding of evolution and/or lack any supporting sources. For that reason, please consider the following: For common responses to creationist arguments please see TalkOrigins. Feel free to start a discussion on something that is supported by verifiable and reliable sources, but if you wish to discuss or debate the general validity of evolution please do so at Talk.Origins, because Wikipedia is not a discussion board. Thank you. --Kuzaar-T-C- 13:20, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Evolution is not a random process. Mutations are random, natural selection is not.
 * A supposed 'gap' in the evolution theory is not equivalent to rebuttal of the theory and evolutionary theory does not predict the existence of intermediate forms between all forms of life (cat-dog/bird-fish etc.)
 * The word theory in science indicates a well studied and supported explanation for a given set of usually undisputed observations.
 * Consider that any scientist capable of disproving evolution would be assured of fame and fortune.
 * We are still looking for the many scientists that supposedly support creationism or intelligent design.
 * You may want to read our article on Project Steve.
 * In general, back up claims that substantially change the content of the article with reliable and verifiable sources.

License tagging for Image:Medusa & El Toro - edited.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Medusa & El Toro - edited.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 16:07, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Removing POV warnings from your userpage
Please do not remove warnings from your talk page or replace them with offensive content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. If you continue to remove or vandalize warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. --Kuzaar-T-C- 04:33, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Viper 2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Viper 2.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 23:10, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:California - Google Earth.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:California - Google Earth.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 23:04, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Please note that this image has now been deleted as it was tagged as not having any copyright status for more than seven days. I have removed it from your user page. --TheParanoidOne 16:05, 15 October 2006 (UTC)