User talk:Brandonpasher

Hello, this is a test --Brandonpasher (talk) 01:10, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Welcome!

 * }

Your updating of references...
Please do not retroactively artificially synchronise the publication date and the access date for references. Every few days some of that comes up in my watchlist and i go through undoing all of it. I think to leave you a note but i am reading day or two old edits so i think you've stopped doing it because it isn't in anything new. Then you do it again. Today you did it to Cougar Town and Fairly Legal to get my attention. Today i am leaving that note i have meant to a few times now. Access date is either the day you correct/update the reference or it is the day it is added to the article. If ratings come out on the 13th but noöne adds them to the article until the 16th of the next month then it is |date=13 June 2010 |accessdate=16 July 2010. Also, there is no requirement to the order of fields in a citation template and most people do not put the author first; most often it is either |url or |title. delirious &amp;  lost  ☯ ~hugs~ 01:01, 27 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Again, i ask you to stop misformatting correctly formatted references - press releases are to be cited as press releases. "ABC Medianet" is a proper name while "ABC Media Net" is completely incorrect yet you keep putting it in. Please don't remove the publication date from references. delirious  &amp;  lost  ☯ ~hugs~ 12:15, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Reliable sources
I've noticed a tendency on your part with regards to TV listings to replace legitimate, reliable sources with official sources related to the network itself. This is entirely unnecessary, especially in the technical sense that Wikipedia emphasizes the use of third-party publications, and when it leads to edits such as the one on the List of Mr. Sunshine episodes, where you removed information (specifically the writer & director for episode 6) because it wasn't included in your source, it starts to become unacceptable. I noticed you caught on to the visibility issue with CBS Press Express, so I don't need to mention that (there are a lot of editors who still don't know about that one, so, nice catch), but generally speaking, the only reasons sources need to be changed are if they update or add to the previous information, or if the previous source is deemed unreliable (and for myself, I do personally try to replace unreliable sources with reliable ones if the information can be found, rather than just revert the edit like some). KnownAlias  contact  14:38, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Your edits on list of Mad episodes
Although your adding of sources for viewership is welcomed, your removal of reliable sources is not. The TV guide is verifying claims that the article is making. So please do not remove it. Thank you. Sarujo (talk) 20:27, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Canadian ratings
If you are going to do any Canadian ratings on shows please learn the release schedule of the data and coordinate it with the broadcast schedule of the show. Not all shows are on at the same time in Canada as they are in the USA. What i found on NCIS LA was wrong. The data for the week of 4-10 April 2011 was released on 15 April 2011, not the 11th. You had the data for the week of 4th-10th with the episode broadcast on 11 April. Oopsies. I know that the Australian data is a bit awkward to navigate so no further comment on that. It isn't quite the same as TVBTN but once you understand it it actually is much less complex. delirious &amp;  lost  ☯ ~hugs~ 14:02, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)