User talk:Brandonqin/sandbox

Peer Review- Rachel
Hi Brandon! Overall, I found your draft contributions to the article "Politics and technology" very interesting. I learned a lot that I wasn't aware of before, and your sources provided me the opportunity to further explore this intersection where Politics meets Technology. I was surprised to learn about how significant "Democracy Earth" is, and their mission is exciting.

Reply: Thank you, I was surprised to see the lack of info on this page too for such a wide topic, so I was excited to contribute.

Article Contribution Tone

 * Is it encyclopedic? Yes, it is written in an academically formal language.

Reply: Got it, thanks!

Easily Understood Lead Section

 * Looking at the lead by itself, do I feel satisfied that I know the importance of the topic? Yes
 * Looking at the lead again after reading the rest of the article, does the lead reflect the most important information? Yes
 * Does the lead give more weight to certain parts of the article over others? Is anything missing? Is anything redundant? No, the lead does not give more weight to certain parts of the article than others. I do not feel anything is missing or redundant.

Reply: Thank you, the lead was already there due to this being a preexisting article, but I can see myself potentially adding a small bit about my new topics of blockchain and platforms.

A Clear Structure

 * Are the sections organized well, in a sensible order? yes
 * Would they make more sense presented some other way (chronologically, for example)? No

Reply: Got it, good to know!

Balanced Coverage

 * Is each section's length equal to its importance to the article's subject? Yes
 * Are there sections in the article that seem unnecessary? Is anything off-topic? Nope
 * Does the article reflect all the perspectives represented in the published literature? Yes, reflected the cited sources well
 * Are any significant viewpoints left out or missing? No
 * Does the article draw conclusions or try to convince the reader to accept one particular point of view? No, the article draft has no biases

Reply: Thank you! In my final drafts I made add more content so I'll make sure to continue my current balance in the draft so far.

Neutral Content

 * Do you think you could guess the perspective of the author by reading the article? No
 * Are there any words or phrases that don't feel neutral? No
 * Does the article focus too much on negative or positive information? No

Reply: Great, thanks! I'll make sure to keep this constant as I make edits.

Reliable Sources

 * Are most statements in the article connected to a reliable source, such as textbooks and journal articles? Or do they rely on blogs or self-published authors? The statements in the article are supported by reliable and credible sources.
 * Are there a lot of statements attributed to one or two sources? No, the article draft is balanced with support and evidence from many sources.
 * Are there any unsourced statements in the article, or statements that you can't find stated in the references? No

Reply: Thanks! I'm looking forward to adding more sources as I think that would be helpful, so I'll look towards similar references as I continue. Rachelkmoy (talk) 06:02, 14 October 2020 (UTC)