User talk:Brandonrolland88

August 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Đàm Vĩnh Hưng has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:56, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Đàm Vĩnh Hưng was changed by Brandonrolland88 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952182 on 2017-08-06T20:56:25+00:00.

Speedy deletion nomination of 9669Films


A tag has been placed on 9669Films requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Cahk (talk) 08:10, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

9669Films moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, 9669Films, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Home Lander (talk) 18:35, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Conflict of interest editing
Hello, Brandonrolland88. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Draft:9669Films, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:53, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi Brandonrolland88. If you are working for 9669 Films as you stated here, then you need to carefully read through Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure and makes sure follow the instructions listed there. Although Wikipedia does not expressly prohibited conflict of interest editing, it is something that is highly discouraged because it can lead to some serious problems rather quickly. The article about your company was moved to the draft namespace by for the reasons given above, and you can continue to work on improving the draft if you like. However, you should submit the article for review via Wikipedia:Articles for creation when you feel it is ready to be re-added as an article. You should also declare whether you are a "paid editor" on your user page per relevant policy. If you have any questions about whether you have a COI or what type of COI you might have, please feel free to ask them at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. The more transparent you are about any conflict of interest you may have with respect to 9669 Films, the less likely you are going to run into problems with relevant Wikipedia policies and guidelines. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:07, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:9669Films Poster.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:9669Films Poster.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the Non-free fair use tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DanielRigal (talk) 22:51, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:9669Films concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:9669Films, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:9669Films


Hello, Brandonrolland88. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "9669Films".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 04:02, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Kendall-K1 (talk) 21:43, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Linh Nga
Template:Linh Nga has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:53, 10 June 2022 (UTC)