User talk:Brankestein/Archive 2

Archive for discussions in 2019.

Disambiguation link notification for April 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Latin songs on the Billboard Hot 100, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aventura ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_Latin_songs_on_the_Billboard_Hot_100 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_Latin_songs_on_the_Billboard_Hot_100?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Where did you get the idea that streaming is not a format from?
If songs can only be released on Spotify or Apple Music and not for download, as some are, then streaming absolutely is a format. Format means the way in which a song was released, either through physical media (CD single, vinyl, cassette, etc) or digital means (download, streaming, etc). If a song is released to audiences for them to stream, then how is that not the same as being released in digital download format to you? I don't know where you've gotten such a weird, non-mainstream idea from, but please don't remove streaming as a format from any articles you come across. It is just as valid as any of the others. You also even have the sentence "...was released to digital retailers and streaming platforms" on Con Calma...that literally supports the idea of it being a format? Considering the amount of articles that list streaming in the infobox or elsewhere (like the release history section), you are in the minority with your view. No need to ping me if you reply.  Ss  112   14:27, 5 May 2019 (UTC)


 * I saw streaming as the "new" airplay. That's why I did not consider it a format, but I see your point. Brankestein (talk) 19:53, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

TFL notification
Hi, Brankestein. I'm just posting to let you know that Billboard Latin Music Award for Hot Latin Song of the Year – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for July 29. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008  ( Talk ) 22:18, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I was not expecting this, thank you! Brankestein (talk) 22:24, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

List of number-one Billboard Hot Latin Songs of 2019
Brankestein, I'm just going to say right now, even if it's not your intention, I feel like every week you are making it a competition as to who can update this list first. I feel like I get to things pretty early most of the time—so when I see someone else has already updated a list like this before me, I feel like they've been hanging out to do it as soon as the list was updated and rushed to do it. I don't enjoy it, so please don't make it a competition, intentionally or not. Thanks.  Ss  112   22:07, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
 * It is not a competition. I noticed that Billboard did not update their charts at the morning (in my country) so I checked occasionally during the day until I saw that Hot Latin Songs was updated. I enjoy being informed about Billboard charts. I am sorry if you feel like I am competing against you. I suppose that I checked the archive just after it was updated. I won't edit the list again if that bothers you. Brankestein (talk) 22:29, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
 * So much for you saying you wouldn't edit the list again? I am not here to compete with editors on who can update information first. You randomly choosing to update the list as early as you can certainly seems like it.  Ss  112   09:16, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I wanted to check if the song "China" had reached its 10th week at number one, but the Hot Latin Songs archive is not being updated since October 5 and I saw that the list had not been edited yet. The information about the song's weeks was available on the artists' chart history and I edited the list because it was not updated. I thought you could not edit the page, since the archives are not being updated and the chart search is only available for premium users. I am not competing. Brankestein (talk) 22:31, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Well, whatever the reason, it's still irksome to see you try and beat me to it. Doesn't matter if you're not competing, the effect is the same. And now you've left this cute little edit summary here... like, what are you even referring to? "It was updated two hours ago"? So what? I would have updated it eventually. It does not have to be done to your preferred timeframe. I'm not going to hang on the "China" song page on Billboard and update it as soon as the chart information refreshes. I'm busy with updating like 10 other charts. Like, you literally haven't edited Wikipedia in three whole days, but you come back to check whether the Hot Latin Songs list on Wikipedia has been updated? Really? Are you going to continue doing this every week if I forget to do it?  Ss  112   02:30, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
 * I apologize if I was annoying to you. I won't edit the list anymore. Brankestein (talk) 02:47, 12 November 2019 (UTC)