User talk:BrasilBritneyBeyonce

June 2007
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to In the Zone. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Miranda 11:47, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Britney Spears discography
Please do not inflate sales figures without citing a reliable source. Please also do not undo the cleanup efforts of other editors by reverting the page without contributing to a discussion on the article's Talk Page first. Thanks. - eo 20:39, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Again, please stop reverting the corrections made to Britney Spears discography per the reasons I've mentioned in my last comment. Thanks. - eo 12:52, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Edits to Britney Spears
Please familiarise yourself with Wikipedia's policies relating to verification and reliable sources. (WP:V and WP:RS). Please also try to stay polite. Hostile edit summaries such as 'get real', with no further explanation, are not going to further your case. If you feel strongly enough about the subject, please discuss it at the relevant talk page. Thanks Rossrs 13:26, 16 July 2007 (UTC)


 * You are missing the point entirely. The source you link to is NOT "Amazon".  It is an editor of Amazon and their editors have about as much status as our editors.   The sentence in the article should not read "According to Amazon...." - it should read,  "According to Mr A. Chocholko, an 18 year old student and Britney Spears fanatic from London, England...." (his own self-description), because it's actually this person who is making the claim, not Amazon.  Don't you see how ridiculous this is?   Please read WP:RS as it contains good information about what is acceptable as a source.  Also, in reference to your edit summary about having 12 sources -  please take note that sourcing is about quality not quantity.   One good reliable source is better than one million bad unreliable sources, so unless one of your 12 sources meets the criteria as stated in WP:RS,  it will not be accepted.  Please now stop reverting this unless you can bring something new to the discussion in terms of documentary evidence.  Constantly reverting without discussing the situation is not going to help.   Rossrs 07:49, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Edits to Blackout
Please do not add again the reverted edits because it looks like a vandal. Please see the history because I stated my reason there. Forums are not reliable. Familiarize it first, thank you and happy editing. --&#946;ritand&#946;eyonce (talk•contribs) 13:03, 29 November 2007 (UTC)