User talk:Brasilian Prince

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Brasilian Prince, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Organisation of the Islamic Conference. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! John Vandenberg (chat) 09:38, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Your message on my talk
Replied there. Thank you. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 18:56, 24 July 2011 (UTC)


 * And again. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 19:47, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Justice Forever for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 22:30, 11 September 2011 (UTC)


 * I am not sure if this is technically possible but I would support an unblock if this user agrees on 1RR rule on Cyprus related topics and to avoid WP:OR, WP:SYNTH, respect WP:RS and not clutter talkpages with arguments ad-infinitum. I have interacted with this user before in many of his incarnations and I can't say he is all bad. His contributions are good overall, except he tends to edit-war a bit too much at times and, in past sock-incarnations, clutter article talkpages while everyone else disagrees with them. If he gets out of these habits he could become a good contributor. Maybe a mentorship program with suitable editing restrictions could help. Something along the lines of a sock-anonymous program. As for their socking past, given that the rest of the socks are stale, I say forgive and forget. Now I understand that for a user to reform they have to acknowledge their past. This needs a Gordian knot-type of solution IMO. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 18:05, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * It would probably take an acknowledgement of the socking, and a full renunciation of it. I agree that some sockmasters do produce good edits at times. It's that so many of them have another side that cancels out the good (and increases the workload on the sock department). Peridon (talk) 20:43, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I fully agree. This is the reason I qualified my support for unblocking. But you made some great points and I agree with your approach. Take care. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 21:23, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Brasilian Prince for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 17:09, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:OrganizationOfIslamicCooperation.png
Thanks for uploading File:OrganizationOfIslamicCooperation.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 26 January 2018 (UTC)