User talk:Brasoveanul

That's an anti-romanian discrimination of all the russian editors.}}

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:Constantzeanu

Salut, am observat si eu cam acelasi lucru - e o diferenta foarte mare intre capitala si provincie - mai ales regiunile de est, unde sal net e cam 70% comparativ cu cel din BUC. Cat despre motivul pentru care am fost blocked, e pentru ca la rubrica Moldovans i-am contrazis pe niste Rusi bolshevici care cred ca au un monopoly asupra ceea ce se va scrie la acel articol. Dapiks 23:37, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Am citit ce ai scris si cred ca aveti dreptate, oricum nu pot intelege cum pot unii rusi bolshevici sa continue inca in 2006 cu teoriile lor depasite din punct de vedere moral si etic. --Brasoveanul 05:42, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Mikka
Yes, I know. I believe we have a case for a RfC. Would you help? Dpotop 10:42, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, why not? I can add my contributions. --Brasoveanul 11:12, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

What the hell is this? And where is your CheckIP and where is your ArbCom? You cannot block one without solid evidences? Until now I haven't seen one.--Brasoveanul 07:34, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

As you sow here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Khoikhoi#Brasoveanul there isn't any evidence to support you, is just your harrassment. --Brasoveanul 07:40, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

I will ask someone to unblock me. --Brasoveanul 07:40, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Help from Meta
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Meta:Requests_for_help_from_a_sysop_or_bureaucrat Help from Meta! --Brasoveanul 12:37, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I request a block for Alex Backarev. He and his anti-romanian editors tried to block any other romanians.--Brasoveanul 08:50, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Present your solid evidences here
According to WP:RFCU: This is exactly the case here. For the evidence you need just to get a glimpse of the original and unrepeatable style of this particular user and compare: and a great number of other accounts mentioned User:Bonaparte/sockpuppetry.
 * 1) Due to the effort involved, difficulty of interpretation of results and privacy issues raised, checkuser is a last resort for difficult cases. Use other methods first.
 * 2) Obvious sock puppets may be treated as such without using checkuser.
 * 3) Please do not list cases involving "throwaway" accounts that are only used for a few edits.
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Brasoveanul,
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Vlachul (indef blocked)
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Greier (blocked)
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/User:Bonaparte (indef blocked)

It might be also useful to note that since the User:Bonaparte has an almost pathological passion of using open and proxies and compromised accounts the RFCU is of a very limited value abakharev 12:39, 15 June 2006 (UTC) -

-
 * No! YOU acted in BAD FAITH and you'll be blocked. --Brasoveanul 12:44, 15 June 2006 (UTC)


 * You listed some links but you haven't provide the real evidences. I can provide you also a lot of links if you want to demonstrate you that you're a stupid anti-romanian. --Brasoveanul 12:45, 15 June 2006 (UTC)


 * So, now I am also Bonaparte, Vlachul, Greier?? You have nothing to prove and you know it. I will ask an admin to block you that's for sure.Brasoveanul 12:47, 15 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Ah Bonaparte, I see you've been permabanned. So sorry... --Vlachos 17:10, 15 June 2006 (UTC)