User talk:Brassduval

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Brassduval, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 14:29, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * Sorry, but the edits you made and which I reverted here do not conform to many of our policies and guidelines, but esp. those demanding that Wikipedia articles be written in a neutral manner. Moreover, you reinserted "notable" people that are not notable by Wikipedia's standards, and reinserted links that do not meet the requirements of WP:EL. I did restore the link to the article in the Jacksonville Free Press--that is the kind of productive edit that will improve the article. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 14:37, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I have again reverted your insertion of unverified and unencyclopedic information. I am sure you mean well, but your edits are NOT in accordance with our policies. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 16:02, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Since you are not responding or communicating either on this talk page or in edit summaries, and since you have again edited the article in a manner that conflicts with more policies and guidelines than I care to mention, I have asked other editors and administrators to look into the matter:


 * Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.   Thank you. Drmies (talk) 16:18, 12 April 2011 (UTC)


 * The advice which you have received above is correct, but so far you have ignored the advice. Your edits are not acceptable.  If you continue to ignore the comments which you have received, here and in the edit summaries in the article's history, your edits are likely to be deemed disruptive, and you are liable to be blocked from further editing.  If you wish to contribute to the encyclopaedia, please read the links which you were given in the welcome message, and take note of the advice which you are being given. If you need further detailed help, please ask, but don't just plough on regardless. - David Biddulph (talk) 16:32, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Echoing the above; please heed to the advice given to you. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 17:05, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

April 2011
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on William M. Raines High School. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:00, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring by violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:29, 12 April 2011 (UTC)