User talk:Brattanie

Iamiyouareyou (talk) 16:11, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

April 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Democrats 66 with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Alan the Roving Ambassador (talk) 15:02, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Democrats 66, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 12:29, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Political parties
Please refrain from making vandalistic edits to articles about Dutch political parties. Use the sandbox if you'd like to experiment. Regards, VR-Land (talk) 13:52, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Do not...
...introduce factual errors into Wikipedia as you did here and here.  Sean.hoyland  - talk 08:07, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Stop fooling around and removing sourced information as you did with this edit and introducing unsourced gibberish! Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 08:53, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing, including repeatedly adding factual inaccuracies to articles, unexplained removal or alteration of well-sourced content, and removal of sources. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:15, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

May 2011
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Libertarian, Direct, Democratic. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Auntof6 (talk) 17:14, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Your editing since your block expired has continued to exhibit some of the problems which led to your block. You also seem to be intent on making articles on political parties reflect your own opinions of them. Since almost all of your edits have been reverted, by various different editors, it is clear that consensus does not support your changes. If you think that they are justified please explain your reasons on the articles' talk pages, so that others can see your reasons, and a consensus can be reached as to whether to accept those reasons. Unfortunately, if you continue to edit in the way you have been doing, without discussion with others, you are likely to be blocked again, and if so then probably for a longer period than before. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:04, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Christian Democratic Appeal, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 15:00, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * It looks as though the above warning was a mistake: your edit at Christian Democratic Appeal does not look to me like vandalism. However, I strongly recommend using edit summaries to give a brief indication of why you are making the changes that you make. This will help to show that you do have a good reason for your edits, and avoid the impression of vandalism. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:36, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

June 2011
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Netherlands Public Broadcasting. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. VR-Land (talk) 12:34, 23 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Can you please explain why you removed a source from Social liberalism? On the face of it, the edit looked unconstructive. In future I ask you to sue edit summaries to explain the purposes of your edits. JamesBWatson (talk)
 * Likewise perhaps you can explain your edit to People's Party for Freedom and Democracy, which another editor regarded as unconstructive. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:49, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at News of the World, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. VR-Land (talk) 15:23, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent unconstructive editing, including further unexplained removal of content (as, for example, at Lacoste) despite warnings. If you think you really have good reasons for such edits then please explain them in edit summaries or on article talk pages. Otherwise you are likely to be blocked indefinitely. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:47, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)