User talk:Bravo Foxtrot

Hyper_Text_Coffee_Pot_Control_Protocol
I don't know if you have gone back to Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol to see my response to your comment, so I thought I'd nudge you: You're right, but darned if I can find a source to support how the article should look. Are you knowledgeable enough to do a better job? - DavidWBrooks (talk) 18:36, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

I have something to say
When i started this account, it was a stupid joke. I made mean articles about my relatives.

But, later, i decided to use WP for good. Good. I created a page for my local phone company (without them requesting one), have edited various slang articles, have clarified dozens of different articles, and have edited important ones, even ones about chemistry elements! I just want to make Wiki a better place. I rely on it for lots of information, and want to give back. I have stopped the joke edits. I have even REVERTED other peoples bad edits. please, cleanse my reputation by removing all VAND related posts to my talk.

PS Do not post anything to my IP address.

pps. even if i Do get blocked,will I still be able to READ wikipedia?

ppps what is the difference between VAND and OR? Ticklewickleukulele (talk) 04:48, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Can you clarify?
I'm very confused about the current state of the Terra-3 article - it's not clear which events the refactoring are referring to. Can you have a look at the talk page? Maury Markowitz (talk) 20:52, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

ANI
See Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents where I have listed your dispute at Hanged, drawn and quartered.

If you make an edit and it is reverted you should follow the WP:BRD cycle and initiate a conversation on the talk page about your proposed changes and try to reach a consensus for any changes that are to be made. -- PBS (talk) 09:05, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Type 94 Nambu Pistol
Thanks for the help on the Type 94 Nambu pistol. I completely forgot about the Miller reference and got some pretty good information from the book. Just a few things I wanted to touch base with you about on the referencing. I tend to avoid gun blogs and websites for references as their information tends to be INCREDIBLY wrong from poor fact checking and everyone claiming to be an expert on firearms, along with failing WP:Reliable. The accuracy of the pistol.=, although poor compared to other weapons, is subjective to the user, with many western shooters unable to properly hold or fire the weapon as it was made for people with smaller hands. The Nambu round itself is not particularly underpowered when compared to round made during the time period and should not be addressed as such in the article. You also to appear to have cited info not in the reference material which you should try to avoid doing. Again thanks for the help, it is good to see another editor interested in Japanese firearms. --Molestash (talk) 18:12, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)