User talk:Brclmu

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place  after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Prolog 06:05, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Debauchery (band)
I noticed that you removed the "notability" tag that I placed on the article. I replaced it because I don't see anything in the article that indicates that the band meets the guidelines of WP:MUSIC. If you add the necessary information to the article, feel free to remove the tag. Otherwise, please leave it up so that another editor can look for the information. Thanks. janejellyroll 04:01, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Responding to the message you left on my talk page: This article would be helped by the addition of reliable, third-party sources that deomonstrate the notability of the band in question. A third-party source would be one that is not affliated with the band (so the band's website doesn't count). Things like sales numbers or chart positions can also demonstrate notability. Please see WP:MUSIC for more information. janejellyroll 04:50, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Responding to the message you left on my talk page: The issue isn't whether or not the band exists (I agree with you that they do), but whether they are notable. The band's offical website and myspace.com profile do nothing to establish notability. Are there reliable, third-party sources that can be added that talk about the sales, touring, or influence of the band? Please look at WP:MUSIC for more details. janejellyroll 20:38, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Responding to your message: Thanks for improving the article so quickly. As I'm sure you've noticed, I removed the tags because I can now see how the band is notable. I don't know much about images myself. . . try taking a look at WP:IMAGE. That would probably be a good place to start. janejellyroll 03:28, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Mindloss
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mindloss, and it appears to include a substantial copy of. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:35, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Aria Galactica
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Aria Galactica, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Aria Galactica.  tomasz.  11:51, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Cynic Paradise
A tag has been placed on Cynic Paradise, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 02:24, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of The Casting Out
A tag has been placed on The Casting Out requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Vianello (talk) 02:25, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

November 2008
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Erzsébet Báthory(talk 13:47, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Timo Lehtinen


The article Timo Lehtinen has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Zero citations/references or external links. Person does not meet notability criteria per WP:BAND and even beyond would reliable sources located and needs improvements. Only connections per "what links here" are part of a broader intra-Wikipedia referencing setup.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♪ daTheisen(talk) 12:18, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Black Harmony


The article Black Harmony has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable demo, WP:MUSIC

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:57, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)