User talk:Breawycker/Archive 2

Your sandbox
Please do not transclude templates (like hangon or editprotected) onto pages like these as it sorts the page into categories (in this case Category:Wikipedia protected edit requests and Category:Contested candidates for speedy deletion) which wastes the time of admins and other editors patrolling those categories trying to deal with genuine requests. Thank you, HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   20:20, 18 August 2010 (UTC) I am going to that right now! Breawycker (talk) 20:21, 18 August 2010 (UTC) done Breawycker (talk) 19:46, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

help
If I use my IP Address when editing accidentally can I say that it's me will I get a sock puppet notice? Breawycker (talk) 18:51, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
 * No. You are fine... They can tell it is you by doing a check user.  JoeGazz  ▲  19:58, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:KrispyKremeCookietinAd.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:KrispyKremeCookietinAd.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:34, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

The Son of Neptune AfD
The Son of Neptune currently has a AfD request and I ask members of this project to give their opinion here.  Perseus!   Talk to me  19:37, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

RFPP request
Hi - just want to let you know that I didn't protect the talk page. Instead, I hardblocked the user in question as a spam-promotional account, meaning that the IP address he used is autoblocked and he can't create a new account without appealing. I won't be able to respond to the block appeal since I blocked him, but I doubt another admin will unblock since he's already made his intentions known. He wasn't vandalizing, but he was clearly here to push an agenda. I think he thought he could insert his desired content if he talked somebody else into doing it. If another account starts doing the same thing, let me know. Thanks. :-)  K rakatoa    K atie   00:42, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Spoons Yogurt
Hello Breawycker. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Spoons Yogurt, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. Ged UK  22:32, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Luke Castellan
Hi. I was wondering if you could tell me which Percy Jackson books says that Luke has a scar that he got from fighting a dragon. Thanks.  Bramble  claw  x   19:20, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Excuse me!!!
Excuse me please, but is you're adding false information and worse is not mentioned .. that's what I'm editing .. I respectfully request that you improve your speaking! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thedarkocean (talk • contribs) 23:53, 9 January 2011 (UTC) what? Breawycker (talk) 23:56, 9 January 2011 (UTC) yes!!== Excuse me!!! == Sarah not sold 133.000 with her symhony album, is 145.000 and this is not a official info and sold over 700... and that's the truth!

sorry but you're the one who is wrong here! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thedarkocean (talk • contribs) 23:59, 9 January 2011 (UTC) It's not me it's 190.154.212.48 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Breawycker (talk • contribs) 19:29, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Rollback
How many times do I have to revert vandalism, before I can be a Rollbacker? Breawycker (talk) 13:58, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Usually a few months of work that includes some reverting vandalism and other contributions that show you understand the difference between good-faith edits, mistakes and actual vandalism are all that's needed. You also need to make sure that you are warning vandals as you revert and reporting them to WP:AIV when necessary.  There are also automated tools (like WP:Twinkle) that can help you with reverting and warning if you need a bit more time at it. Shell   babelfish 15:51, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Subungual hematoma
It wasn't my contribution that was reverted. I just added an interwiki. You should recheck the list of edits to find the real culpit. Atlantia (talk) 17:42, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Esoko changes
Hello, I am in Accra, Ghana attempting to update the Wikipedia page for Esoko (where we are based). I saw that you reverted my changes, though feel that my changes did not constitute vandalism and were in good faith. It was just a much-needed update about the company. How can we move forward? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thebelgialn (talk • contribs) 14:53, 11 January 2011 (UTC) Thebelgialn (talk) 15:01, 11 January 2011 (UTC) I'm sorry about the mistake I made. I saw the Tag saying you removed references, and I must have thought that you were vandalizing the page. I will remove the warning from your page, and restore Esoko to your edit. Once again I am sorry. Breawycker (talk) 15:21, 11 January 2011 (UTC) Thanks for the turn around Thebelgialn (talk) 15:31, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Reviewer permission
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   21:37, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Rollback
Hello, per your request, I've granted you Rollback rights! Just remember:
 * Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including Huggle and Igloo, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
 * Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
 * Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
 * Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
 * Please read Help:Reverting and Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
 * You can test Rollback at New admin school/Rollback
 * You may wish to display the User wikipedia/rollback userbox and/or the Rollback top icon on your user page
 * If you have any questions, please do let me know.

HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   21:37, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

Level 1 warning re. vandalism on Albert Ball ???
Hi Fantastic Brain (hummm) warning ??? vandalism ???? :-(

All I did was add my own Photo of his VC & the location of the Albert Ball memorial homes. If you believe this warrants a warning or is an act of vandalism I don't believe you are operating in the spirit of Wikipedia.

Please revert back to the previous edit, you are for more experienced that I but surely my edits add to the page If you can fit it into the article I will remove the warning from your page. Ok?--Breawycker (talk) 18:38, 16 January 2011 (UTC) ~Photo of the medals next to the Other awards list & Google Earth link next to the eight homes in Lenton, not too sure how I can fit this is better... Seriously I was stood next to his VC, watch, aircraft windscreen, flying gloves & telegramme yesterday, I'm only adding to the tapestry

Premature move
You prematurely moved Spider-Man (film series). In future please refrain from moving pages while discussion is still in progress. Requests are generally processed after seven days, although backlogs often develop. If there is a clear consensus after this time, the request will be closed and acted upon. If not, the closer may choose to re-list the request to allow time for consensus to develop, or close it as "no consensus". The processes involved in closing requests, performing moves and necessary tidying tasks when a move is performed can be viewed at closing instructions. Thank you. --TriiipleThreat (talk) 18:50, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Hey!
Shut up! What I put on East Liverpool High School page was completely true! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.219.150.106 (talk) 21:48, 16 January 2011 (UTC) I'm sorry,but "It is a h*llhole in the middle of no where." doesn't really belong on wikipedia, but maybe on your blog! Breawycker (talk) 23:05, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Edit to Tom Allen Bio
I am questioning why my edit deleting the reference to other elections was undone? The reference is irrelevant--the article is about Tom Allen, not about the 2008 national elections--he was taking on a popular incumbent, so it was always an uphill battle. The point of saying he lost while others elsewhere won "overwhelmingly" is what? Seems like a sly dig at him. As I said initially, it's POV and needs to be gone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.241.219.250 (talk) 01:50, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

I removed a copyvio. Don't revert and give me a template warning without even looking at the damage you are doing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.235.62.113 (talk) 18:38, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Careful there.... (re Nicole Miller)
Please take a little bit more care with that shiny new rollback button, your reversion here reinserted a copyright violation into the article, an issue which was indicated in the previous edit summary. Mistakes happen, not trying to be a pain about this, just a friendly "hey!". Have a great weekend! (Oh, and if I've got this all wrong, lemme know.) Cheers! -- j &#9883; e decker  talk  19:39, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Confederate States of America
While you may have reverted the IP because you thought it was vandalism, I reverted it because it was factually incorrect. I provided both an edit summary and commented on the article's discussion page. There was no justification for you to revert my edit w/o you first joining the discussion. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 22:08, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

IP 62.172.89.238
My advice, don't go back and forth with him. Either ask an admin to block his talk page access too, or ignore him.--Cube lurker (talk) 19:35, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
 * You shouldn't be restoring those warnings—it's against WP:BLANKING, which explicitly allows anybody to remove any content from their own talk page, even warnings and block notices. The only exception is declined unblock requests while the relevant block is in effect. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   20:10, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

about the last warning
As you might have seen on this IP's talk page, this is a Toronto library computer--an express computer that's on for 15 minutes before the next "client" uses it. Suffice to say, I'm not the vandal for the trumpet article. I also noticed that while the IP address is the same, I've seen this IP on a different computer at a different library branch. If you are doing a block, I suggest less than 30 hours. Hope that helps. :-) 205.189.194.208 (talk) 18:02, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Girl Scout cookies in popular culture
Breawycker, you voted to merge into Scouting in popular culture at Articles for deletion/Girl Scout cookies in popular culture. If merge is the conclusion, I fully intend to do it. Could you please read thru the article and tell me which items listed are encyclopedic enough to keep? Thank you, D O N D E groovily   Talk to me  16:15, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Hello, about my Sarkozy article edit
I am offended you put me as a violator. The original translation of his quote isn't as representative as it should be. Being french and having studying the origin of all the major french swear words led me to correct it. I mean, "pauvre con" litterally mean "poor cunt". First off sign your post!, and second Use this here!!!' not my talk page!, third it doesn't mention the quote. --Breawycker (talk) 23:15, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Music Is Revolution Foundation
Hello Breawycker. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Music Is Revolution Foundation, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''I don't feel this is promotional. It is a COI and may not qualify as a notable organization, but it's not a G11.''' Thank you. 7 23:08, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Yamaha DX1 article question and your involvement
Breawycker why did you revert the Yamaha DX1 article? Did you discuss this first or just did because of what? Do you own a DX-1? Do you have any information on a DX-1? It helps.

I just wrote an update and you just choose to erase that information. Why? I am not paid to edit, I do this on my spear time to update the article. The sources of imformation came from me as I contributed a great deal of time to provide sources and information and when someone erases it like that, I question why. So made you choose to do this? Do you have links of sources and etc information I can verify your revert edit?--Globalstatus (talk) 22:17, 13 February 2011 (UTC) Sorry about, that that was the revert that i regretted, but I can't do anything about it until the 20th. P.S. next time use this page when reporting error with Igloo, Huggle, and Twinkle.--Breawycker (talk) 18:27, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion tag at Bonji water
Sorry, but I removed your speedy deletion tag because the blanking of the page was vandalism and therefore not eligible for speedy deletion. IPs can't make articles, for that matter. Guoguo12 --Talk--  20:10, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Reviewer help
why can't I change Pending revisions protection for a page?--Breawycker (talk) 22:44, 16 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Because, only administrators can change protection settings.


 * You can ask for a change though, on WP:RPP, and if there is a reasonable reason, an admin will change it for you.  Chzz  ► 23:05, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

‎//httpwww.meenaonthenet.com.. etc
Agreed, a very bad title, but I don't think it qualifies for a speedy delete under C1 as that applies to "unpopulated categories". Perhaps "A7. No indication of importance (individuals, animals, organizations, web content)":, or  are better templates? Or did you mean "G1. Patent nonsense."? ;-) - 220.101 User talk:220.101.28.25\ 16:01, 19 February 2011 (UTC)


 * I meant G1. --Breawycker (talk) 17:26, 19 February 2011 (UTC)


 * No problem, Breawycker. I hope you will forgive me, as I have added a line space before your reply, otherwise it appears on the same line as mine. I also added a 'colon', :, immediately before your text, as this moves(indents) your reply out for readibility. I have 2 colons, :: , to indent my reply even further. See wp:Indent, for more info. Happy Editing! - 220.101 User talk:220.101.28.25\ 18:07, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Your recent RFA
I am sorry, but I have closed your Request for adminship prematurely. Simply put, you only have 1509 edits on Wikipedia; while your edit count isn't the only determining factor, and numerous people have their own personal standards by which they judge RfA candidates, this particular RfA was all but assured of not passing.

I am sorry about this, and I hope you don't take it personally. If you continue to contribute to the project in a positive fashion, I am confident that you would be able to submit a successful RfA in the future. You may wish to consider applying for an evaluation by other Wikipedia editors for feedback on how to obtain the necessary experience. Once you are ready to request adminship again, there is a great admin coaching program available, as well as a guide to requests for adminship.

If you have any other questions about becoming an administrator, please don't hesitate to ask me. Good luck! → ♠ Gƒoley ↔ Four ♣ ← 01:04, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

it was SO constructive
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-aBvDpjRreI --24.49.42.224 (talk) 03:07, 21 February 2011 (UTC) ✅--Breawycker (talk to me!) Review Me! 13:04, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Hello
Hello I have a huge idear —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.105.194.223 (talk) 15:54, 21 February 2011 (UTC) What?--Breawycker (talk to me!) Review Me! 15:56, 21 February 2011 (UTC)