User talk:Breezeagentyt

May 2019
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Shooting of Mohamed Bah. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Alexf(talk) 12:21, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I'm IdreamofJeanie. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Shooting of Mohamed Bah have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 13:22, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: BreezeAgent (May 11)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CAPTAIN MEDUSA was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BreezeAgent and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:BreezeAgent, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:BreezeAgent Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CAPTAIN_MEDUSA&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:BreezeAgent reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk) 13:23, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:BreezeAgent


A tag has been placed on Draft:BreezeAgent, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk) 13:24, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

May 2019
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. MER-C 13:29, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

--UTRSBot (talk) 03:05, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Talk page access revoked
Here, you altered an unblock request in an attempt to mislead administrators. There's no longer any doubt, you do not have good faith. I have revoked your talk page access and will leave the existing unblock request to another administrator to review. I noted prior to your attempt to mislead us, that your hope under WP:SO was faint given your rampant abuse. Your actions have significantly reduced this. --Yamla (talk) 13:40, 12 May 2019 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 07:07, 13 May 2019 (UTC) --UTRSBot (talk) 20:52, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Block evasion
This user engaged in block evasion as in May, 2019. --Yamla (talk) 11:18, 18 May 2019 (UTC)