User talk:Brenda CNola

Welcome!
Hello, Brenda CNola, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Brinckenhoff House - Now operating as an Historically renovated Inn, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Tagishsimon (talk) 02:55, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Brinckenhoff House - Now operating as an Historically renovated Inn


A tag has been placed on Brinckenhoff House - Now operating as an Historically renovated Inn requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.brinckerhoffinn.com/history.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tagishsimon (talk) 02:55, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Brinckenhoff House


A tag has been placed on Brinckenhoff House requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.brinckerhoffinn.com/history.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tagishsimon (talk) 03:06, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

NO COPYRIGHT EXISTS...BECAUSE A COPYRIGHT SYMBOL IS ATTACHED TO WEB DOES NOT A COPYRIGHT MAKE. IN DOING DILIGENCE YOU CAN SEE THAT NO COPYRIGHT EXISTS. I WOULD LIKE TO THINK THAT DILIGENCE IS DONE PRIOR TO ASSERTIONS OF THE CONTRARY.

October 2018
Please do not use Wikipedia to promote businesses, like you did in the article Brinckenhoff House. Wikipedia is not a trade directory. If you want to list a company for potential customers to find, please consider alternative outlets. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 04:05, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Also... THIS IS NOT A BUSINESS PROMOTION THIS IS TO ANSWER THE DAILY CALLS AND EMAIL ABOUT THE HISTORY OF THE PROPERTY. IN THAT THE SAME FAMILY OWNED IT FOR 297 YEARS (MY FAMILY) WE NO LONGER OWN OR OPERATE THE PROPERTY BUT WANTED TO KEEP THE HISTORICAL RECORD INTACT.

You cannot post copyrighted material on Wikipedia even if you are the copyright holder, unless special licensing permissions are in place. In short, a copyright owner cannot offer Wikipedia a one-time license for use. Rather, the copyright to the material has to be released – permanently and irrevocably – into the public domain or under a free copyright license that is compatible with Wikipedia's licenses. This is because Wikipedia aims to be freely distributable and copyable by anyone, so all content must be licensed for that purpose. You can learn more about this policy at Copyrights. THERE IS NO COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL. BECAUSE A WEB DESIGNER THOWS A COPYRIGHT SIGN ON A PAGE DOES NOT AUTOMATICALLY COPYRIGHT THAT INFORMATION. COPYRIGHT ARE FILED THROUGH THE REQUISITE GOVERNMENTAL OFFICES AND NO COPYRIGHT EXISTS FOR THIS MATERIAL. AS CLAIM OF SUCH DOES NOT MAKE IT SO.

Another problem is notability. I am not sure the topic you are writing about is notable enough, as Wikipedia defines it, to have an article. We require write-ups in reliable third party sources such as newspapers, magazines, or online publishers to establish notability. New articles about persons or things that are not notable are typically deleted.

A third problem is conflict of interest. Writing an article about your own business or that of a client is strongly discouraged, as it is difficult to maintain the required neutral point of view. EVERYTHING PUBLISHED SOURCES FROM BOOKS ABOUT THE BRINCKERHOFF FAMILY AND THE INN IS LISTED IS SOURCE GUIDES THOUGH OUT THE WORLD...HARDLY SELF PROMOTION. WE GET MORE REQUESTS TO TOUR THE PROPERTY THAN WE DO IN RESERVATIONS.

If you'd like to use the copyrighted content in an article, you can follow the instructions at Requesting copyright permission on how to obtain the proper licensing. If you are the copyright holder, refer to Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for how to grant us permission to use your content. Alternatively, you could write a new article that does not closely paraphrase the material available online. See Copying text from other sources for more information. However you would then still have to abide by the conflict of interest guideline, not intend to use Wikipedia for promotion, and even so, there is there is still a likelihood that the article may be deleted due to lack of notability. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 04:48, 20 October 2018 (UTC). THERE IS NO COPYRIGHT MATERIAL. THE WEB HOSTER PLACES ERRONEOUS INFORMATION BUT NO COPYRIGHT EXISTS WHEN DUE DILIGENCE IS DONE.


 * I'm afraid that is a misconception. In principle, copyright protection applies to all creative works as soon as they are published, not when they are registered with a government agency. For this reason, our copyright policy would have required us to delete the articles regardless of whether your web designer included a copyright notice. Mz7 (talk) 23:22, 22 October 2018 (UTC)


 * A few of things about reply to talk page messages:
 * Per Help:Talk pages, please reply in a complete block after the end of the last comment of the message thread. Please don't embed your replies within the lines of the existing comment, because it makes it hard to follow, and to distinguish who said what.
 * Sign your posts by typing four tilde ( ~ ) characters at the end of your message. This will insert your username along with a date and timestamp to show when you replied.
 * Please do not use ALL CAPS when replying. It is considered the equivalent of shouting and therefore impolite.
 * --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 18:10, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Brenda CNola


A tag has been placed on Brenda CNola, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Johnj1995 (talk) 21:02, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

July 2023


Hello, Brenda CNola. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but a page you created Brenda CNola has been deleted as meeting one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects of articles must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources which are unconnected with the subject  and which provide verifiable information. Someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see WP:CORP for subjects that are groups or companies or organizations. Please see WP:ANYBIO for subjects who are people. Please see Common sourcing mistakes (notability). The Wikipedia Adventure is a useful tutorial.

Also, encyclopedia articles must be neutral in tone and not use language that promotes or advocates for a subject, or tries to cast the subject in a favorable light. Please see Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid here and here. Sometimes creators of promotional/advocational content are bewildered that it is considered such. If one has been trained to write such content, or if one has spent some time writing such content, one may simply be blind to non-neutral phrases or styles.

A common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. Anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc.

CV's/resumé's are by their nature promotional. Writing about oneself or any connected subject is discouraged as the connection can make objectivity difficult. Information on avoiding advocational content and common pitfalls is  here and here, however be aware that these are not exhaustive.

New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. You can also ask for help at the WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk, and on IRC chat. Sometimes it is better to first gain experience by fixing and helping maintain existing articles. Community portal/Opentask contains links to things that badly need doing, if you are so inclined. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:07, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Alternative Golf Association, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Bamyers99 (talk) 19:15, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Warning
Hello, Brenda CNola,

There is no reason to move your User talk page to a nonexistent User page. No reason at all. So far today, your editing has been entirely disruptive. If you don't stop with the vandalism, you will be facing a block soon.

If you have questions about editing on Wikipedia, page moves or Wikipedia policies and guidelines, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 20:36, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Brenda CNola. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the edit COI template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 20:41, 14 July 2023 (UTC)