User talk:Brendanwood78

November 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Shane Gericke has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Shane Gericke was changed by Brendanwood78 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960388 on 2014-11-30T00:24:59+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:25, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

May 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 15:03, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Deleted Truths
So you're telling me that simply adding facts to a page gets people blocked from editing. Instead of having the truth for people to read, wikipedia would rather let editors that clearly cannot stand the harsh light of truth get their way. You are cowards. Brendanwood78 (talk) 15:12, 9 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Considerable discussion on the talk page was resolved with a rough consensus, reflected in the current wording.


 * You can open a new discussion.


 * You cannot decree that your opinion is truth and override the consensus. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 16:25, 9 May 2018 (UTC)


 * You added content to describe him as a "convicted murderer and journalist who was convicted of murder". It was reverted not just because of the recent discussion, but because your edit was repetitive. VQuakr (talk) 20:31, 9 May 2018 (UTC)