User talk:BrendelSignature/June 2007 to August 2007

Image:Median_Household_Income_International.png listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Median_Household_Income_International.png, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 12:14, 2 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The graph in question has been replaced, so this one can be deleted.  Signature brendel  18:39, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Developed country
1. You've forgotten to add three countries to the IMF list: France, Netherlands, and San Marino. Note that San Marino is recognized by the IMF as a developed country, as one may see in the IMF page, in the second section (beginning with the words: "A few").

2. You've mistakenly put "South Korea" between Japan and Luxembourg.

3. Why did you add the "OR" tag to the "CIA and IMF" list? Instead, you could simply change the heading "CIA and IMF" to the heading: countries/territories classified as "advanced" by CIA and IMF. This is not an "OR" since my suggested heading doesn't include the word "comprehensive"; Instead, the heading declares its specific sources (CIA and IMF), and doesn't serve to promote any position (since the word "comprehensive" doesn't appear in that heading).

4. The word "comprehensive" should be deleted from another heading which you havn't marked as "OR".

Eliko 18:56, 7 July 2007 (UTC)


 * As to your reply - see my response in my talk page
 * Eliko 08:35, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

see my response
Eliko 21:04, 8 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I did. Thanks,  Signature brendel  00:35, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:MK1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:MK1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) (random) 16:25, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Just a random question
Hey, I noticed you were a prominant contributer to the United States article, and so I figured you would be a good person to ask. I notice that whenever I click on anything for the United States article, it is enormously slow, even if my internet is fine. I even get edit conflicts when using rollback with TW. The only thing I can think of is the size of the article, or the constant traffic might be making it difficult to get to. I was wondering if you ever had this problem, and if so you knew how to fix it. If you have no idea what I'm talking about, or why it happens, feel free to disregard this :) I   (said)  (did) 10:35, 12 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I think it is the length of the article combined with high levels of traffic. I also have a broadband high speed conection and sometimes it takes a while to load. Unfortunately my area of expertise is the social sciences so I don't know of any way to fix it. If you do find a way to make the page load quiker, let me know!  Signature brendel  00:46, 13 July 2007 (UTC)


 * So you too have difficulties loading the page? Well thats good. Well, not really, but at least I know I'm not crazy. I'll ask Mrzaius, since he is one of the other main contriubters. I   (said)  (did) 04:19, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:B18370.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:B18370.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 07:53, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

I unprotected User talk:71.235.81.32
unless they escalate the threats, we need to give them somewhere to appeal the block if they decide to behave. Protecting an indef blocked IP's talk page is generally not the standard way of doing things... indef'ing an IP is pretty rare, too. I tagged the page with the indef-blocked-IP template. Someone may come back and ask you to change it to something like a 6 month or 1 year block; I won't, but don't be suprised if someone else does. Georgewilliamherbert 22:01, 17 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Okay. I suppose you do need to "give them somewhere to appeal the block if they decide to behave" - though I don't beleive there's much of chance in this case - but you never know. Regards,  Signature brendel  22:28, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Prose size
I'd been doing it by hand initially, partially using sed to strip out obvious XML and wiki syntax, but then someone pointed out a javascript extension on my talk page - just four lines to add to your monobook layout, or whatever skin you use. Hope this is useful, MrZaius  talk  00:14, 20 July 2007 (UTC) ''PS: Also fixed a couple of typos on your most recent project and posted a couple of initial thoughts on its talk page. Hope ya don't mind.''


 * Thanks for the link and your quick response as well as the suggestions on my new article. Happy editing,  Signature brendel  19:28, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

George W. Bush
Sorry about the fast revert. I've just been dealing with a lot of vandalism on this page today. I think your edits add to the article.--Southern Texas 00:01, 24 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I understand, thanks. Have fun editing,  Signature brendel  00:02, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Ok now that my Block is over...............
I have to ask this, and mind you I could of just used another IP to ask before my block is over, but far be it from me to defy the all mighty admins 8-/. Anyway, here is the question, did you even look at the situation at all, did you even see what I was reverting, did you even see that other people at WikiProject Comics agreed that it was vandalism or did you just blindly block me cause of what you saw on the recent changes. Now please do not give me any BS reason or rules cause honestly I only follow one rule, just anserwer the question, either Yes I looked at the situation, or no I just blindly followed the rules. Thanks.Phoenix741 11:36, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

If someone is repeatetly vandalising an article you need to report that user to an admin so he or she can be blocked


 * And what leave that stuff that does not belong on wikipedia on there. After the 3rd revert I put something on his talk page and took off the info. Also, the wikiproject agreed that it was all theory and that it should of been removed, one even said that it was a form of vandalism because of the frequency that it kept poping up. There was no source, it was all theory, and I knew that. Your right I have been on here for at least a year, and besides this little incident, I have done nothing wrong, therefore don't you think I know what does belong on wikipedia, and what doesn't. Or are you so blinded by the rules that you just follow them with out looking at the situation.Phoenix741 21:17, 26 July 2007 (UTC)


 * If an entire Wikipedia project was behind you, why did you ask for administrative assitance. Why were only two users, you being one of them, engage in an edit war. I am impuing your skills as an editor, but you shouldn't have engaged in an edit war. Instead you should have contacted the other person, and/or reported him or her - and yes sometimes that means leaving their edits in place, so long as they are not obvious vandalism. Regards,  Signature brendel  22:24, 26 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Ok I got 2 things to say.

1) what does Impuing mean (looked it up and I got nothing), cause I want to know if that was a compliment or not.

2) sry I can't do that, I will explain why I took something off(eve if it is obvious like oringial research or just plain theories)and I will talk to the person, but I will not let it stay up, and here is why, if someone was looking at the article while it is being discussed then that person will get the wrong idea about the character/team/event/whatever and the article. and that is something I will not allow, admin's rules or not.Phoenix741 22:33, 26 July 2007 (UTC)


 * 1) That's a typo, it should be "Impune" - it's missing an n
 * 2) That's is why should have contacted admins to take action, instead of violating the 3RR ourself. That's what we're here for. Why didn't you contact us on one of the noticeboards. Regards,  Signature brendel  22:45, 26 July 2007 (UTC)


 * One thing I have noticed about this kinda stuff that if you get into the policy and shit, this whole wikipedia just well plain sucks. I wana keep the fun factor up, and honestly, admins and fun, do not go togeather, and please don't refer me the the "fun" section of wikipedia, cause well I saw it, and it is lame 8-/. Anyway, I did ask for help around the 4th edit(honestly I think the 3rr is also BS) and we talked about it and everything, and it looked like everything was good. Then(and no offence) you come and block people, kinda late weren't you. That is also why I did not contact admins, not real good responce time. which goes back to my whole, don't want people to see the stuff that is obviously not good for the article.Phoenix741 22:54, 26 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, what can I say. There are policies on Wiki and I'm sorry if you think that they're not any fun (They're not designed to be either). Yes, sometimes it takes a short while for admins to respond (there are only about a thousand of us on the entire EN WP). But if you decide not to contact us, not to make WP policy your ally and violate the 3RR, don't blame me for doing my job as an admin. Regards,  Signature brendel  22:59, 26 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Meh I see why rules are there, don't get me wrong, all I am sayiing is that people who just follow the letter of the law and don't look at just the situation at whole, well take out whats fun out of wikipedia. And like I said before I only follow one rule on here and that is this one, I know it may see rebellious and what not, but well I see it as the only way for wikipedia to work. So I guess that is that, c ya Phoenix741 23:10, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Don't say I'm making disruptive edits
You don't know what you are talking about. I'm providing sources in Toyota article or you are bigotted person who wants GM to be number one. Your provide your sources. The other users were making POV biased and false entries. Look at the facts. 67.41.152.96 00:13, 27 July 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm not involved in editing either of the article. I simply responded to complaints about disruptive edits. If you think an article is biased raise the issue on the talk page, start a Request for Comment but do not intitiate an edit war.  Signature brendel  00:25, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Salary Professors
Hi! I really liked the added data on wages in the US! Only I was wondering whether it would be an idea to also include the numbers for the US in the 'Europe' section as these are calculated in the same manner as those of the other countries thereby making it easier to compare the real wages in different countries? Again - just a suggestion - like your work!

Query with Political ideologies in the United States DYK hook
I raised a query about the hook for your article Political ideologies in the United States earlier today. Basically I don't think it's really justified by the data in the survey you're quoting particularly when you consider the stated margin of error. I wonder if you could respond, as it would be a shame if the superb article slipped through the DYK net just because of a hook problem. Cheers, Espresso Addict 15:54, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Images by user Brendel with no-commercial-use conditions
If the IP 75.23.134.181 was you, please confirm this at that page by making a logged-in edit. Alternatively, you could remove the "non-commercial" or "Wikipedia-only" restrictions from the image pages (also while logged in). Otherwise, these images will have to be removed. Cheers, Lupo 07:29, 5 September 2007 (UTC)