User talk:Brennanfs

October 2016
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Plessy v. Ferguson, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. RunnyAmiga ※  talk 13:37, 5 October 2016 (UTC)


 * I see your point that I should not reference/cite another Wiki page. Yet for the truthful updates I made, there are very rare original sources.  What to do?  Ignore reality?
 * I see your point that I should not reference/cite another Wiki page. Yet for the truthful updates I made, there are very rare original sources.  What to do?  Ignore reality?


 * Cheers,
 * Brennan


 * Don't get under the impression that "because it's true" is enough to add something here. This is especially important when you're adding irrelevant, contentious stuff to an article as sensitive as Plessy v. Ferguson. RunnyAmiga  ※  talk 15:40, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Don't get under the impression that "because it's true" is enough to add something here. This is especially important when you're adding irrelevant, contentious stuff to an article as sensitive as Plessy v. Ferguson. RunnyAmiga  ※  talk 15:40, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

An interesting observation. Truth is irrelevant now. The info I added was not irrelevant. Go clean up the sites I cited now to wipe away facts I cited.


 * "Truth is irrelevant now." You forgot to read what I wrote! Because if you had, you'd know that I never came within a mile of saying, implying, or even hinting anything even close to that. Or maybe you did read it, meaning your incorrect characterization was deliberate. Either way, yikes.


 * So as you asked, I cleaned your edit by removing it. One of your previous edits, the one containing a deliberate misspelling of "Democratic," was a nice giveaway as to your true motives, as if it weren't already obvious. There are countless places on the internet to fight partisan battles; Wikipedia isn't one of them. RunnyAmiga  ※  talk 23:52, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Plessy v. Ferguson. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. clpo13(talk) 23:50, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Also, please be sure to sign your posts using four tildes ( ~ ) so others know who wrote what and when. clpo13(talk) 23:51, 5 October 2016 (UTC)