User talk:Brensgrrl

Snape Edits
When someone reverts your edits, calling them too long, its important to discuss that revert, rather than changing it back without discussion - that is what the Discussion Page is for. I think you adding non-crucial info to the article, but if you disagree, please use the discussion page to talk about it. - Arcayne   (cast a spell)  05:16, 8 August 2007 (UTC)


 * You are now at three reverts. I have tried to ask you to discuss your edits, and for whatever reason, you choose to ignore the matter. I am changing it back,. If you revert again, I will report your for a 3RR violation. - Arcayne   (cast a spell)  05:21, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

You are being unreasonable. Your edits are highly unbalanced and do not reflect canon. See my posts on the discussion page. If you don't stop, I will report YOU. Brensgrrl
 * With respect, my edits do not have to reflect canon; they have to reflect WP policy. If that canon can be cited through reliable (read: non-fan) sources, then canon and policy work together. If they do not, then WP policy is going to win within Wikipedia every single time.
 * As well, your characterization of my edits as unreasonable is unfounded. When you started reverting, i asked you to discuss your edits on the Discussion page for the article. You ignored me, not once but twice. That tells me that you are the one being unreasonable. A reasonable person doesn't mind discussing their edit, and welcomes ideas on how to improve them. You didn't do that, and even engaged in edit-warring over your edit. In what was is that reasonable?
 * Lastly, I've read the Discussion page (thanks for finally bringing your concerns to the page, btw), and other editors addressed your concerns adequately. I think this resolves the matter. - Arcayne  (cast a spell)  18:12, 8 August 2007 (UTC)