User talk:BretDvr

Your submission at Articles for creation: PolyAI (April 4)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:PolyAI and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:PolyAI Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jamiebuba&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:PolyAI reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 23:07, 4 April 2024 (UTC)


 * I submitted this article (Draft:PolyAI) about two months ago, and it was rejected because I did not have enough notable sources. I've received a couple of additional sources that I would like to know whether they would rise to the level of notability and allow my article to be published. I could add more information from the articles to the pages, if necessary, but would like to make sure they are valid before resubmitting.
 * https://www.businessweekly.com.tw/archive/Article?StrId=7008288 (From Taiwan, translated version here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PAdnoed5WI2PuvDDnP-NEU32a1VI_iqK/view?usp=drive_link)
 * https://startups.co.uk/startups-100/2023/polyai/
 * Thanks.  BretDvr (talk) 17:44, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

PolyAI - Additional Sources - Establishing Notability?
I submitted this article (Draft:PolyAI) about two months ago, and it was rejected because I did not have enough notable sources. I've received a couple of additional sources that I would like to know whether they would rise to the level of notability and allow my article to be published. I could add more information from the articles to the pages, if necessary, but would like to make sure they are valid before resubmitting.

https://www.businessweekly.com.tw/archive/Article?StrId=7008288 (From Taiwan, translated version here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PAdnoed5WI2PuvDDnP-NEU32a1VI_iqK/view?usp=drive_link)

https://startups.co.uk/startups-100/2023/polyai/

Thanks. BretDvr (talk) 18:03, 27 May 2024 (UTC)