User talk:BrettA343

Welcome!
Welcome!

Hello, BrettA343, and welcome to Wikipedia! I have noticed that you are fairly new! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. I also see that some of your recent edits show an interest in the use of images and/or photos on Wikipedia.

Did you know that ...
 * ...Wikipedia has a very stringent image use policy?
 * ...most images from Flickr, online news websites, and other web sources are copyrighted?
 * ...Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously?
 * ...freely-licensed images should be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, a central location for images where they can be used on all Wikipedia projects?
 * ...we recommend that new users use our "files for upload" process - at least until you get the hang of things?

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type  on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Llammakey (talk) 12:29, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Manual of Style

I impress upon you to use the tutorial and read the Manual of Style. You really need the help. Llammakey (talk) 12:30, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chateau Lake Louise, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lake Louise ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Chateau_Lake_Louise check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Chateau_Lake_Louise?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:22, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

A minor point on minor edits
You just marked this edit as minor. A minor edit is one that does not significantly change the meaning of the text, such as typo, spelling, grammar or markup corrections. The checkbox is there because there is an option when looking at page histories, recent changes, and watchlists, not to show minor edits, to help the significant edits stand out. Adding a comment to a discussion on a talk page is pretty much never minor, even if the comment is not of much importance. Just a tip for future reference, not a major problem, so to speak, (LOL) DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 02:52, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for setting me straight . I've been using it incorrectly since I arrived (LOL, too) BrettA343 (talk) 03:27, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Its not a, ahem, major problem. The serious issue is when someone tries to hide a controversial change to an article by marking it as a minor change. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 03:51, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Sorry for moving the image in Mountaineering
Sorry I took the image you put in Mountaineering and moved it into the Mountaineering section in mountain. I did this while moving a bunch of images around. If you want to add it back you are more then welcome to. LoreMaster talk 19:39, 2 June 2020

Image description
Hi, I have fixed the description for File:Inuksuit in Auyuittuq, Nunavut.jpg. Hope it's okay now. Wiki-uk (talk) 05:24, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Squaw, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Canmore.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edward Peak (September 30)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Buidhe was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Edward Peak and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Edward Peak, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Edward_Peak Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Buidhe&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Edward_Peak reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

(t &#183; c)  buidhe  21:27, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Added, as per intructions...

Please specify just what you are claiming is a personal attack, Hike395.
Hello. You deleted my section heading and then said it 'violated policy'. What did my heading say, please? Please indicate what you considered against policy. The intent was to journal MONGO's actions and text against me and I don't consider truth against policy or a personal; attack - it is merely fact. If MONGO takes Ac tion A against me, surely I can note said action in posts - otherwise, no one knows what he has done. And I'd suggest that calling my photograph 'ridiculous' and (especially) making up (fake) 'Policy' and claiming that as the reason for deleting my photo is a personal attack. I wonder if you did something similar to user MONGO (I think he deserves more than that for violating policy). Cheers, Brett.

P.S. I did not call him a blatant liar, but the facts would seem to support that contension due to his making up (fake) policy to support his wants.


 * Hi, Brett. The section header had a question: "Is he trustworthy or a troll?". Everyone who edits the section would repeat this in their edit summaries. Even couched as a (possibly rhetorical) question, I think this is not being civil, and violated No Personal Attacks, so I simplified the header. If you want to engage more editors to help settle a dispute, it's important not to come across as uncivil. One useful thing to read is WP:AVOIDYOU --- arguments should be about guidelines, not about people.


 * I think it's important for both sides of the argument to assume good faith. MONGO has been a valuable contributor to Mountain-related articles for 15+ years. You look like you have a lot of accumulated mountaineering wisdom and photographs to help improve Wikipedia articles. It looks like we're reaching consensus at Talk:Mountaineering on the photographs. But, more importantly, I hope that we can all productively contribute to Mountain-related articles in the future. If you continue on your current path, I'm afraid that we're going to either lose you or MONGO as an editor. That would be a darn shame.


 * I'm hoping to cool the temperature down by collapsing (not deleting) your comments that appear to attack MONGO. If you have a dispute with an editor, I think you should let the discussion thread speak for itself, rather than try to interpret it for other editors. Any editor can remove comments that are personal attacks (see the policy at WP:NPA). I'm exceedingly reluctant to do that myself --- I thought that by collapsing the comments that you said were optional to read, we could get back to a place of harmonious editing. I'll repeat that you're completely free to object to my collapsing and unilaterally remove it (You would remove where it says collapse top and collapse bottom) and I wouldn't revert. I think that's not in your self-interest, though --- you may come across as being aggressive to other editors whom you are trying to convince.


 * You may wish to take a look at WP:HOTHEAD for tips on what to do at this point --- it might or might not be helpful to you. My sincere hope is that we can resolve the dispute at Mountaineering, forget about any possible personal attacks on any side, and then move onto productive editing.


 * In case you missed it: I used two of your photos at Commons:Mountaineering and one at Commons:Mountains. What I've done in the past when I remove photos from an en article is use them in the corresponding gallery at Commons, so I wanted to incorporate your photos there.


 * I'm not sure what do about the watermarked image File:Mt._Columbia_from_Columbia_Icefield_bivy_for_the_Twins_et_al.jpg. Cropping the watermark out would produce a photograph with odd composition. Cleaning up the watermark would take me hours with a tool like GIMP.


 * I can remove the watermark, but in return, I'd ask you to WP:CALM down and stop attacking MONGO. Would you be willing to do that? — hike395 (talk) 06:55, 29 November 2020 (UTC)


 * B-Bye, and good luck. BrettA343 (talk) 16:36, 29 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Uh oh. Does that mean you're leaving Wikipedia? I sure hope not --- I think we can get past this. You might have fun contributing photographs over at Commons. — hike395 (talk) 18:58, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi! A little late to the conversation.  Firstly, in any sort of editing dispute, it's always best to keep discussion focused on the edits rather than the editors, and why a certain edit is an improvement or not.  (See  Dispute resolution for lots of info and advice, or WP:LAME for examples of petty edit wars.)  I'm more of a textual editor (my first good article has no images besides an infobox map) but I've been in a dispute about images and I've helped resolve a couple others.  The things I generally look for are: (1) does the image add encyclopedic content, and (2) does it support (or illustrate) the accompanying text of the article.  If the images don't add sufficiently to the article, I'd delete them as I would superfluous text.
 * Another editor mentioned how pictures are a snapshot in time. This reminded me a bit about how quotations are a single person's opinion.  In both cases, these are single views which may not be consistent with the broad summary style required for an encyclopedia.
 * For something like the rope-work, you may want to consider staging a photograph specifically for the purpose of illustrating the text. It doesn't have to be up on a mountain (so long as you don't make that claim).  Caption it with something like, "climbers practicing rope maneuvers; note... [details]".  If the object is to show the ropework, then do so, and don't worry about the scenic backdrop or "authenticity" of whether it took place on an actual expedition.
 * That's just my opinion. I hope it is of help. – Reidgreg (talk) 16:24, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Images for WPCAN10k
Hi! A couple months ago you joined WikiProject Canada/The 10,000 Challenge and asked about pictures. Sorry that I didn't reply earlier, I became less active at about that time and no one else was minding the shop. We have had more editors submitting image-related improvements to the challenge list, though it's still a small minority. What we like to see are improvements that will "stick", which generally means well-referenced new articles and expansions. However, most of my editing involves "cleanup" (such as layout work or copyediting) and that certainly is an article-improving effort which counts for the challenge. Images, I feel, are a little less "sticky"; they can come or go in an article, as with updated statistics. Still, if the picture provides encyclopedic content and illustrates some Canada-related content to a Canada-related article, I think it ought to count for the challenge. Please be sure that the image licensing is correct, and that the image is well documented in its description on Commons (being specific in the where and when, and what it is showing). – Reidgreg (talk) 16:24, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Edward Peak
Hello, BrettA343. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Edward Peak, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Edward Peak


Hello, BrettA343. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Edward Peak".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:46, 30 March 2021 (UTC)