User talk:Brettcm82

Speedy deletion nomination of Manwith10toes


A tag has been placed on Manwith10toes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Tb hotch * ۩ ۞ 08:12, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

February 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added a hangon template to an article, Manwith10toes. In order for an administrator to evaluate whether the article should be speedy deleted or not, we request that you provide reasoning, on the article's talk page, for why it should remain. Thank you. —Ute in DC (talk) 08:24, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Virginia Beach, Virginia, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Kiwi128 (talk) 08:27, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Virginia Aquarium. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Virginia Aquarium was changed by Brettcm82 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954436 on 2011-02-25T08:28:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:28, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Plant sap, you will be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Plant sap was changed by Brettcm82 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2011-02-25T08:34:09+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:34, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Fruit preserves, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Fruit preserves was changed by Brettcm82 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.965966 on 2011-02-25T08:36:44+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:36, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 08:47, 25 February 2011 (UTC)