User talk:Brewcrewer/Archives/2010/June

Catherine Glick: allegations of racism
Brewcrewer please understand the distinction between the documentation of allegations and allegations themselves. The "allegations of racism" section is heavily referenced.

You suggest that the references provided are unreliable, not neutral, and not in line with BLP standards. Again, please understand the claim being made. The claim is that Catherine Glick has been accused of racism. By providing documentation for these allegations, I am not aiming to substantiate the allegations. In fact, I would love it if instead of unilaterally censoring this documentation, you and others found and inserted evidence to dispute the claim. Given that the claim is that Glick has come under fire for alleged racism, the writings of individual authors arguing that Glick's work has racist undertones is reliable and neutral with regard to the claim that Glick has faced criticism for alleged racism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.110.8.85 (talk) 16:45, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 19:07, 15 June 2010 (UTC)