User talk:Brewcrewer/Archives/2010/September

Duda
Thanks for letting me know. You did a great job with the article.--Yankees10 02:07, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
 * your welcome and you're far too kind.-- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 02:08, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

DYK problem
Hello! Your submission of Lucas Duda at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --Brian Halvorsen (talk) 20:15, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
 * thanks man, fixed the issue.-- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 01:46, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Lucas Duda
 — Rlevse • Talk  • 00:03, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Erdinç Tekir
Hi. How do you think about this edit ? Takabeg (talk) 15:07, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Don't think too highly of it. I will elaborate further at that talk page.-- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 22:15, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Question
In mid-June 2010 I created an article entitled Jihad satire. It was sourced with both academic and popular sources, the academic sources about the use of satire as a method of relieving tension among populations who feel threatened by terrorism and about the use of satire as a means of of undermining the popularity of violent jihad among a population of potential recruits. It also cited popular articles about comedians including Jeff Dunham and other stuff including Jihad! The Musical. I went to look at it today and it appears to have disappeared. I certainly never was notified of an AFD. I seem to recalled that notifying the article creator is a courtesy, not a requirement. Still, I am puzzled.... As I was writing to you, I thought of a different way to search and found this. Can this article be restored? If you google "jihad satire" you will find the phrase. More to the point, the article cited academic sources that deal with the concept, although I do recall that the phrasing included variants, jihad comedy, terrorism and humor, and so forth. I am not unreasonable about phrasing, but I did think that it was a reasonable article, and that the assertion that "The article is a Neologism, based on original theories and conclusions and lacking reliable source" is unreasonable.AMuseo (talk) 23:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
 * It was deleted by the Prod process. An editor places a "prod" template on the article explaining why he thinks it should be deleted. If anyone disagrees with the prod, the article must go though the afd process for it to be deleted. You really should have been notified of the proposed deletion. In any case the article can be recreated. If you still have the content offline you can simply recreate it. If you don't, you can contact the deleting administrator (in this case User:Seraphimblade) or any other administrator who has access to deleted articles to provide to you the deleted content. If you run into any problems or have any other questions, please let me know.-- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 23:40, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks:)
For your lovely vote in my Rfa dear Brewcrewer. It mattered a ton. Kind regards.  Wifione    .......  Leave a message  16:07, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of September 2008 Peshawar bombing for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article September 2008 Peshawar bombing, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/September 2008 Peshawar bombing until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Codf1977 (talk) 09:46, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

The Original Barnstar

 * You're far too kind, Amuseo.-- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 18:58, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Y Haplogroup F
Hello, I am surprised by this edit. It is unusual for a person to jump into a disagreement so strongly without first trying to touch base. Can you please tell me about your thoughts concerning Haplogroup F*? Why did you choose to enter the situation in this way?--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 19:43, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Responded there.-- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 20:07, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 20:19, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I've answered your first and second posts on the article talkpage as far as on-topic subjects are concerned. In your second post you also mentioned "irrelevant points and semi-personal attacks". I certainly agree with keeping those off the talk page so I hope you don't mind me asking for confirmation here about how to improve in this respect. Please feel free to use my talk page instead if you like.
 * I am not sure how you would define a "semi-personal attack". Would this mean something which is not ad hominem but which is clearly critical of a fellow editor? For example, saying someone is editing against consensus, or asking someone to use the talk page before reverting? Would those be what you mean?
 * Concerning the irrelevant points, if it would not take too much time I would like to ask what this refers to, perhaps by citing a couple of examples?
 * Cheers--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 16:33, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I will respond at the article talk page when I get a chance. Best, -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 16:35, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I appreciate the intention but honestly I have to strongly recommend against putting such a discussion on the article talk page. What would be the reason for doing that? I am asking for personal editing advice not directly related to the article. Please do respect the fact that communication there has involved a lot of difficulty and distraction already. Obviously we all aim to get past that right? Whether you as a friend of Jayjg blame me or Jayjg for the distractions would not make a difference. Can I ask for this personal side discussion to be on a personal talk page?--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 19:07, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
Thanks for pointing this out. Jeremy McClean (Talk) 21:35, 27 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you, and chag sameach.AMuseo (talk) 21:21, 29 September 2010 (UTC)