User talk:Brewcrewer/Archives/2011/October

Reconsider Pallywood
I referred to a footnote, which you say you can't see. It's right there, note 3. from the Jerusalem Post (But pro-Israel media-watchdog advocates have gone further, arguing that the footage is a prime example of what has been dubbed "Pallywood" - media manipulation, distortion and outright fraud by the Palestinians (and other Arabs, such as the Reuters photographer caught faking photos during the Second Lebanon War), designed to win the public relations war against Israel.) So, do the decent thing old chap, and reconsider. The edit you reverted had a solid reason you just happened to miss. We all have our bad days.Nishidani (talk) 21:19, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
 * which JP article?-- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 04:06, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

User:Noloop
Thought you might want to know that User:Noloop/User:Mindbunny has said you are racist in this comment. I've asked him to redact the comment on his Talk: page. Jayjg (talk) 00:07, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
 * in an ironically racist comment.......one of those ANI's might be in order.......but didn't he go though a whole bunch of them on his other user name..User:Mindbunny?-- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 03:17, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Care to explain?
I reverted your edit. Under WP:TAGGING: "Anyone who sees a tag, but does not see the purported problem with the article and does not see any detailed complaint on the talk page, may remove the tag." In the future, please do not add POV tags without following the proper procedure. Thanks. -asad (talk) 20:33, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Survey for new page patrollers
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 11:54, 25 October 2011 (UTC).