User talk:Brewcrewer/Archives/2012/November

Jabari edit
Awfully sorry about that, I had actually intended to undo your predecessor's edit, the same edit you undid. The "they're still around" was about his use of "Israelite". Best wishes, Poliocretes (talk) 19:09, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
 * cool.-- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 19:17, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Just to let you know, I mentioned you in an AE case related to this article. Not because I have any problem with the edits, but I wanted to highlight what I felt was an inconsistent approach by the person who filed the case. Dlv999 (talk) 11:01, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I'm happy to see you are watching carefully all my edits. -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 11:44, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Not at all, I just looked at the history of the page in question. Your edits were clearly labelled as reverts stating who you had reverted so you were the easiest example to present at AE, that is all. Dlv999 (talk) 11:49, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Request for mediation response requested
Can you please respond to the request for mediation at Requests for mediation/Jerusalem? The deadline to do so is approaching. --  tariq abjotu  20:48, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Maan News
A nice balanced opinion-piece. ' Ankh '. Morpork  20:16, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Google translate did not do a great job, but so much I was able to determine is that it is a lovely article. Mind you this "newspaper" is used throughout the relevant articles as a reliable source.-- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 20:24, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * With writers capable of such incredibly psychological insight, of course it's reliable. You obviously didn't pick up on the socialogical and historical expertise of the writer, nor his beautiful poetic prose. ' Ankh '. Morpork  20:27, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

This is unacceptable
A user is stubborn to remove important and huge content not mentioned anywhere in the article. I think we need your opinion about it.--Rezibalas (talk) 06:12, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Please watch this article. Pluto is trying to remove huge content that is not in the article, including Egyptian airstrikes, battles of Kfar Darom, Yad Mordechai, Nirim, Nitzanim (southern front). He is taking advantage of the fact that nobody is doing anything so he can vandalize pages related to Israel with impunity. Thanks.--Rezibalas (talk) 13:59, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
 * He says he has no problem with the content except that it is redundant. I don't have patience at the moment to examine the diffs. Are you sure the content at issue is not repeated elsewhere in the article? -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 14:20, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi Brewcrewer,
 * The content is partly redundant. The contributor who added it (I assume HerutJuram at the time...) didn't even take care to read what was already in this section. For the remaining, I think these are useless details regarding "this airstrike of 2 planes" or "that assault" in an article dealing with 1 year long war.
 * Pluto2012 (talk) 07:34, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

celebrations
You might be looking for this No More Mr Nice Guy (talk) 19:03, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for pointing it out. -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 19:26, 29 November 2012 (UTC)