User talk:Brewcrewer/Archives/2018/November

1984(magazine) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 1984(magazine). Since you had some involvement with the 1984(magazine) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:11, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Briarcliff
I'm disputing your edit because it's not contributive. The division is a well-established term, with over 3,900,000 hits. This is directly from the The U.S. Office of Management and Budget: please see New York metropolitan area for the definitions and breakdowns.

Specificity is not a bad thing, nor are there any typos or unsourced content there; that's an excuse or lie or something else. This Featured Article went through extensive reviews by the most experienced of Wikipedians, and they appreciated this level of detail. ɱ (talk) · vbm  · coi) 17:56, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Stick to article talk page, not here, and please don't insult my intelligence with ghits of searches that are not in quotes.  brew crewer  (yada, yada) 19:06, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
 * you're not acting civilly here; I'll ask you to watch your behavior. I'm not acting hostile here, neither should you. I wrote on your talk because I wouldn't presume that you watchlisted that article, and because my problem is with you, not with the article in general. ɱ  (talk) · vbm  · coi) 04:50, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
 * You should get out more often.  brew crewer  (yada, yada) 20:17, 29 November 2018 (UTC)