User talk:Brexit123

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Brexit123! Thank you for your contributions. I am Dan D. Ric and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Dan D. Ric (talk) 21:48, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community


 * Thank you for your edit to Karuvarai Pookkal, which removed a red link. It is preferred to avoid piped links however, (see Piped link) This can be done by simply moving the comma outside of the . Dan D. Ric (talk) 21:55, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Brexit123, you are invited to the Teahouse!
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:22, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Discretionary Sanctions Notification for Paraphilia and Transgender Issues
 Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 18:01, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017
Hello, I'm CityOfSilver. I noticed that you recently removed content from Alt-right without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  City O f  Silver  00:40, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Depression Quest
Another editor and I have reverted your edit at Depression Quest for the third time now.

You removed reliably sourced content without any explanation, and replaced it with unreliably sourced content which is unrelated to the rest of the section, and which appears to push a POV. I would suggest reading our guide to reliable sources on video-game-related articles, which makes clear that we don't mention user review scores. In fact, we generally don't include user scores anywhere on Wikipedia, because our articles should be based on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. If you have any questions about this edit, please bring it up at Talk:Depression Quest. Woodroar (talk) 00:57, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Discretionary sanction alerts
Since you've been editing on these topics, you should be aware of these discretionary sanctions as well:

 Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 01:44, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Kat Blaque. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''Your edits are clear BLP violations as well as WP:OR. ''  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 01:52, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Edit warring notice
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Gender policing. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 08:14, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Conspiracy theory. (ESkog)(Talk) 17:45, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Notification: Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Vandalism. If you feel this block is unjustified, you may contest it by adding the text below. (ESkog)(Talk) 17:47, 27 April 2017 (UTC)


 * Brexit123; please do not take what I am to say as anything in the realm of support for your editing philosophy, as I imagine, if I looked into it more deeply, i would probably not :) but, all things being equal, an indefinite block following from a 24-hour one- admittedly both for disruption- does seem rather 0--->Defcon five in sixty seconds. Indeed, the edits themselves hardly seem explicit vandalism; some kind of POV pushing at most- which of course, is be disruptive in itself- but to the level of an indef?
 * Mind you, @ReviewingAdmin, if I've missed an elephant in the room, feel free to disregard the above. &mdash;  O Fortuna   semper crescis, aut decrescis  18:49, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks to not only finding it in the room, but also going elephant hunting, as it were. I withdraw my previously badly chosen remarks :)  &mdash;  O Fortuna   semper crescis, aut decrescis  19:36, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

{{unblock| I was unaware that my edits were POV pushing, I was only accused of it twice and never given a {{unblock reviewed | 1= I was unaware that my edits were POV pushing, I was only accused of it twice and never given a warning stating I would be banned. I am very sorry if it come across as POV pushing, I was just trying to help. | decline = Procedural decline, as per below. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:47, 28 April 2017 (UTC)}}

April 2017

 * Note to administrators. This is now a CheckUser block.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:35, 28 April 2017 (UTC)