User talk:Bri2499

Super Duper Tuesday
Thank you for your email, however in the interest of full transparency, I prefer to discuss all content-related issues on talk pages so that everyone can see all aspects of the conversation. In regards to the sentence under dispute in the Super Duper Tuesday article, it initially said:

However in a bid to increase their own importance in the selection process, several states have moved up their contests, something critics describe as being "pure self-interest." [cited to BBC News article]

This sentence appears to follow Wikipedia's official policy on neutral point of view, as it states both the supportive reason for the move ("to increase their own importance in the selection process") and the response by critics ("something critics describe as being 'pure self-interest.'"). Additionally as the line includes a direct quote from the BBC News article, it has been properly cited as per the official policy on verifiability.

While I feel that the line is in compliance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, in the spirit of compromise I am willing to soften its language. If you are genuinely interested in improving the article, the support section could use a major expansion. It would be especially beneficial if the section were to have several quotes and citations added from reliable, published sources. Thanks, --Kralizec! (talk) 17:35, 11 August 2007 (UTC)