User talk:Bri3jor/San Pedro mummy (Wyoming)

I think you're doing fine with this entry. You could be adding more hypertext, with links to other Wikipedia articles. I'll try to add more comments later. 01:08, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi, don't mean to butt in, but I was looking at what other students are doing and noticed that your article on the San Pedro mummy of Wyoming might get flagged for Non-neutrality, you might want to rewrite sentences to avoid the word alleged. --LeviK3a (talk) 13:15, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Please look at the changes I've made. Levi was right, this article was not prepared in a way that was carefully balanced. Another significant problem with it is that you rely upon highly questionable source material, all of which is in online web pages. A responsible entry would have been based on reliable print publications. While the web is a good starting point, sites such as http://abovetopsecret.com and others cannot be treated as if they were reliable sources. If there have been scientific studies, there should be available publications. Where did these websites get their information? That's what you should have researched and consulted before writing this article. Hoopes (talk) 19:14, 28 November 2010 (UTC)