User talk:BriKaBraK

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Hi BriKaBrak Sorry for reverting your edit in the EU article wholepiece. You are right that the numbers given should reflect the lists they refer to. I changed back your edit because I made a mistake, I was only looking at the ranking. If we consider EU as a single entity, its rank sould be corrected as if none of the individual member states exist; otherwise rich countries in the EU would only pust the EU rank lower, rather than higher. That is how we came to the rank no's 13 and 14 (that this is much higher then in the full list is because there are several rich EU countries that have to give up their rank - e.g. Luxembourg). That said, I should have checked the actual numbers more carefully and should not have reverted your edit completely. Sorry for that, hope to see more of you in the future with constructive edits. Arnoutf 19:02, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * You're quite right about the rankings, thankyou for correcting that. As for the numbers... well I'm not sure where the old numbers came from. Still, it doesn't matter now. BriKaBraK 19:31, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Victorian era
Was there anything in particular that you thought needed cleaning up? CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 17:24, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The article is generally confused and in some cases just plain strange. Why is there a massive section on prostitution? Was prostitution the key issue in Victorian times? Why is there no section on the expension of the British Empire? The social changes passages were scattered and often unencyclopedic. It just seems that the article badly focused, with huge emphasis on unimportant issues and sometimes even no mention of major issues. It needs to be generally cleaned up, and I dont think I have time to do all that needs doing, hence the label. BriKaBraK 18:52, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
 * OK. Pretty much the same things that are mentioned on the talk page. Just wondered if it was something else. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 13:48, 2 September 2007 (UTC)