User talk:Brian1997

Welcome
Hi Brian! Thanks for your edits to Elizabeth II. Unfortunately, I am going to have to revert them, because there is a Wkipedia policy that honorifics are not used in the articles. If you looked further down the page, there is a section specifically on the way the Queen is "styled" or addressed.

Don't be discouraged! People's early edits often get deleted, as it takes a little while to learn the ropes! Here's some more info on editing.

In the meantime, you might like to look at Thames Diamond Jubilee Pageant as well. Amandajm (talk) 02:27, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

AJM's advice to new editors

 * Look at the article to see how it is laid out. The Table of Contents is the best place to start.
 * Read the article to see if what you want to add or remove is appropriate, necessary, or adds value.
 * Search for the right place to put it.
 * Check Use the "Show Preview" to make sure that what you have done is appropriate and correct.
 * Discuss any change about which you are uncertain, by placing your proposed text, or just a suggestion, on the talk page. Someone who watches the article will usually answer in a day or so. You can monitor this by clicking the watch tag at the top of the page.
 * Be aware
 * that an addition inserted between two sentences or paragraphs that are linked in meaning can turn the existent paragraphs into nonsense.
 * that a lengthy addition or the creation of a new sub-section can add inappropriate weight to just one aspect of a topic.

When adding images
 * Look to see if the subject of your image is already covered. Don't duplicate subject matter already present. Don't delete a picture just to put in your own, unless your picture is demonstrably better for the purpose. The caption and nearby text will help you decide this.
 * Search through the text to find the right place for your image. If you wish it to appear adjacent to a particular body of text, then place it above the text, not at the end of it.
 * Look to see how the pictures are formatted. If they are all small thumbnails, do not size your picture at 300 px.  The pictures in the article may have been carefully selected to follow a certain visual style e.g. every picture may be horizontal, because of restricted space; every picture might be taken from a certain source, so they all match.  Make sure your picture looks appropriate in the context of the article.
 * Read the captions of existent pictures, to see how yours should fit in.
 * Check the formatting, placement, context and caption before you leave the page by using the Show preview function, and again after saving.
 * Discuss If your picture seems to fill a real identifiable need in the article, but doesn't fit well, because of formatting or some other constraint, then put it on the talk page and discuss, before adding.
 * Be aware that adding a picture may substantially change the layout of the article. Your addition may push another picture out of its relevant section or cause some other formatting problem.
 * Edit before adding. Some pictures will look much better, or fit an article more appropriately if they are cropped to show the relevant subject.

Amandajm (talk) 02:28, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Linking to common terms such as countries
Hi Brian. I've reverted some of your edits to BBC, Judi Dench and others, because the general consensus is to avoid linking to common terms or countries in most articles, unless they are relevant to the subject. Take a look at WP:OVERLINK for a few pointers on this. Also changing British to English or vice-versa has always seemed somewhat pointless to me. Generally it should only be done if a person identifies his or herself as being British or a national of one of its constituent countries. So, a Tory peer would almost certainly identify as British, whereas a member of the Scottish National Party would identify as Scottish. You might like to read the Nationality article, which covers this topic at some length, though I must admit it throws up as many questions as it answers. Cheers Paul MacDermott (talk) 22:42, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ashley McKenzie (Judo)


The article Ashley McKenzie (Judo) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. undefined — Bill william compton Talk   15:06, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

England/UK
Replacing mentions of the word England or English with United Kingdom/British in articles as you recently did to the articles on Danny Boyle and the Shard is nothing but POV-pushing - and completely against community consensus. You have had your edits of this nature reverted before so you must be aware of this: Your edits are nothing but disruption and vandalism and will be treated as such. --Τασουλα (talk) 22:16, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

POV editing
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! If you use an edit summary it will help others to understand your motives - at present many of your edits appear to be POV-pushing and are therefore considered disruptive and/or vandalism.  Timothy Titus Talk To TT  04:28, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)