User talk:BrianWansink

Eileen kennedy
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Eileen kennedy, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://enews.tufts.edu/stories/040704KennedyNamedDean.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:57, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Eric Hengtes 2008.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Eric Hengtes 2008.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:18, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Eileen kennedy
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Eileen kennedy, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * un-referenced and insufficient assertion of notability (also orphan)

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Scott Mac (Doc) 12:47, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello BrianWansink! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:51, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Eric Hentges -
 * 2) Robert C. Post -

Proposed deletion of Robert Post (official)


The article Robert Post (official) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Possible close paraphrasing from the CNPP bio too.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The-Pope (talk) 16:46, 29 April 2011 (UTC)