User talk:BrianY

Blogs
Blogs are allowed under specific, narrow circumstances. The prohibition derives from the general ban on self-published sources. One exception to the SPS ban covers writings of acknowledged experts, but that doesn't apply when writing about living people so it'd only applicable to dead politicians. Blog can be used in articles about the bloggers themselves, but they don't establish the bloggers' notability. The relevant policy is WP:SPS, Blogs that appear on the websites of mainstream newspapers, which are usually written by reporters and are edited, are allowed. See WP:V. As for the fact that no one has objected, Wikipedia is a huge project. It may be that no one has noticed. Also, the reality is that perfunctory assertions don't bring much scrutiny.  Will Beback   talk    03:10, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I suppose the logic is that we have to draw the line somewhere, and blogs fall on the wrong side of that line. I'm no sure what the right answer is regarding minor candidates. I'd be surprised if blogs are the only place they're mentioned. If they make an announcement on their own blog then we can use that for a source, though it can't be used to establish notability.   Will Beback    talk    18:19, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
 * "This early in the cycle"? What's the rush? Wikipedia isn't a voter guide. Minor canddiates are almost always included in the final vote counts, so if need be we can wait until after the election to mention them.    Will Beback    talk    18:40, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

But as a general principle, candidates in primaries for the House of Representatives are numerous, and many of them probably aren't worth mentioning, except to perhaps include their names in some list of candidates. In the case of Jacobson, his career as a candidate only lasted a few months.  Will Beback   talk    19:49, 1 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Regarding the Ellmore book, I've replied on the article talk page.   Will Beback    talk    19:55, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

CSD G1
Hi, thanks for your work in WP:NPP :). The reason I reverted that edit which you linked to on my talk page, was because the page does not meet CSD G1 as defined at WP:CSD. Because G1 is only for articles which are impossible to understand (e.g. "fghfhfdsgfdngdf"), not including bad spelling (e.g. "hewp me 2 certe an new pg pws"), and not including vandlaism (e.g. "grass is blue"). The page in question (Gareth Quirke) is easily understandable; I can tell it's about a person, who lives in Sudbury. And the user who created the page asks for it not to be deleted (as it has been twice before). Hope that's clear, if you have any questions or comments, feel free to ask :). Cheers - Kingpin13 (talk) 23:58, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

AFD for Mark Ellmore
Would you favor deleting Josh Segall as there is nothing unrelated to the election as well? BrianY (talk) 18:31, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment – Yes I would. On the other hand, here is a politician am actually supporting under a Keep opinion in aAFD discussion as it pertains too Brad Lander. The difference between the two is that  Mr. Lander, in my opinion, established notability outside the political arena, (i.e. other than running for office).  Hope this helps in explaining my current opinion, Delete,  with regards to the article for Mr. Ellmore.  Take care. ShoesssS Talk 18:53, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Carrie Nottingham
If I could, I would. 98.248.32.178 (talk) 18:39, 6 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Look at the talk page. 98.248.32.178 (talk) 18:41, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

RE:Review
Hi. Thanks for doing the editor review. Appreciate it. I'll be working to improve. :>) Happy editing! Bejinhan  Talk   04:00, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

User:Philip Leirsund
''I have been monitoring some edits with User:Philip Leirsund. Is it fair to report him to AIV or somewhere as a vandal-only account?''

Absolutely. Go for it. Good riddance to bad rubbish. --Calton | Talk 04:52, 13 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Aaaaand, he's toast. --Calton | Talk 05:17, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

CSD G4
Again, thanks for the good work on WP:NPP - that's important stuff. Just a nit - G4 doesn't apply to articles that have been speedily deleted - for the most part it only articles that have gone through WP:AFD. All that being said, I've deleted LANSDOWNE again for CSD G11. Toddst1 (talk) 20:16, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Hey
For the last few months my schedule has been a bit full, but it looks like I may have some time free for a little while at least. I'll see what I can do with the three pages. Hope you have a good vacation! CylonCAG (talk) 15:28, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * SSP is my primary source for down ballot info. I hadn't heard of dcpoliticalreport.com but I will check it out.  Thanks!  CylonCAG (talk) 15:34, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll keep the page up to date until you're back. CylonCAG (talk) 03:09, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Sorry
I didn't know the rules of editing the page. Maybe I should look at the talk page before I edit, from now on. FallenMorgan (talk) 22:16, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

CA-18 and KS-3
Cook rates both as only likely Democratic, while Sabato also rates KS-3 as likely. When I removed them no one rated them as anything but safe. CylonCAG (talk) 19:15, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

RE: Articles_for_deletion/Cuban nobility
Would you consider redirecting this article to History of Cuba  right now?

Instead of having to wait 7 days, I can  close the Afd right now, and only a redirect will remain.

Please let me know as soon as possible, because as soon as someone else comments on the AfD, they must agree also before I can redirect the article and close the AFD.Ikip (talk) 07:04, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the help with my adoptee!


BrianY, A Nobody has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. --A NobodyMy talk 04:03, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Re:2010 House race ratings
Thanks for your comment, and praise. When it comes to 10 edits to just 1 edit is right. The thing was with Rothenberg, I had to keep looking back and forth. Normally, I would just do 1. Thanks for your comment and interest in politics. =) America69 (talk) 18:30, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Left or right?
We are moving category names so the correct number is both together, the old one should be empty within a day or so. Rich Farmbrough, 21:28, 15 October 2009 (UTC).

Editor review archived
Since it has been well over 30 days since you requested to be reviewed, I've gone ahead and archived your request as part of my effort to cleanup Editor Review. You may view your review here. Thanks & happy editing. If you have any questions, please message me on my talk page. =D Netalarm   talk  00:13, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom Election RFC courtesy notice
A request for comment that may interest you is currently in progress at Requests for comment/Arbitration Committee 2. If you have already participated, then please disregard this notice and my apologies. Manning (talk) 08:19, 1 November 2009 (UTC)  You received this message because you participated in the earlier ArbCom secret ballot RFC.

Invitation to participate in SecurePoll feedback and workshop
As you participated in the recent Audit Subcommittee election, or in one of two requests for comment that relate to the use of SecurePoll for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the SecurePoll feedback and workshop. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome. For the Arbitration Committee, Risker (talk) 08:02, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Opinion needed!
As a frequent editor of American politics, I would appreciate if you put your two cents into the debate over the conservative support for President Obama in Talk:Public image of Barack Obama. Thanks.--Jerzeykydd (talk) 22:50, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Motto of the Day
Hi there, BrianY! Thought you might be interested in Motto of the Day, a collaborative (and totally voluntary) effort by a group of Wikipedians to create original, inspirational mottos. Have a good motto idea? Share it here, comment on some of the mottos there or just pass this message onto your friends.

MOTD Needs Your Help!

Delivered By –p joe f (talk • contribs) 09:55, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

2010 elections
Hey. I put the competitive election summeries in a seperate article to make it easier for casual readers, and not to mention that the races by state section had a lot of material. The only thing I did was copy and paste. But I also have other material on the page that deals with the swing districts of the past two election cycles. So, I hope to eventually merge the two sections together, having the race rating, summery (which you made), and the results of the past two election cycles. Doing this, we will give readers a full analysis of the 2010 elections.--Jerzeykydd (talk) 02:30, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

MOTDs (This space for rent)
You may have noticed over the past few days that the MOTD that you link to on your user page has simply displayed a red link. This is due to the fact that not enough people are reviewing pending MOTDs here. Please help us keep the MOTD template alive and simply go and review a few of the MOTDs in the list. That way we can have a real MOTD in the future rather than re-using (This space for rent). Any help would be appreciated! –p joe f (talk • contribs) 18:50, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Jeff Merkley healthcare.png missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:Jeff Merkley healthcare.png

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 08:48, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Motto of the Day Help Request April 2014
Motto of the Day (WP:MOTD) is in a state of emergency and really needs your help! There are not enough editors who are reviewing or nominating mottos at Motto of the day/Nominations/In review, and this probably means that you will notice a red link or “This space for rent” as our mottos for the next weeks and months.

Please take a moment to review the nominations and nominate your own new mottos at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review and Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/'Specials. Any help would be appreciated! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 29 April 2014 (UTC)


 * This message has been sent by p joe f on behalf of Motto of the Day to all editors of the English Wikipedia who are showing MOTD's templates on their pages, and to all the participants to MOTD: (page, template, and category).

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Jeff Merkley healthcare.png


The file File:Jeff Merkley healthcare.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 4 April 2020 (UTC)