User talk:Brian johanson

March 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Last Post has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Last Post was changed by Brian johanson (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.931703 on 2015-03-26T12:41:34+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:41, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Last Post. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Edison (talk) 04:42, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * [Strike part about vandalism in the above edit and add:]Your edits do not appear to be vandalism, just unreferenced statements along with what appear to be some personal observations, which were removed from the article, and which you then added back without improvement. Please see the Welcome message above and there are helpful hints about what does and does not belong in an article, and how to add references for facts you want to add to an article. We look for some reference like a book, magazine article, or a reliable website references, as opposed to "I know all about this because I was there." If you find a reference but are not sure how to format the inline citation, you can go to the article talk page or you can ask another editor, like me. Regards. Edison (talk) 13:57, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Last Post
Hello. Not everyone would agree that your edits to Last Post constituted vandalism. I see them as a good faith attempt to improve the article - not that my opinion bears any weight, of course! What I do see, though, is that what you wrote is not usable in its current form. It reads more like a personal essay or piece of opinion. There are a few ways of advancing your ideas for improving the article and indeed the encyclopaedia. Most directly, you could go to the article's Talk page and say what you want to do, and other editors, if interested, can comment and offer advice on how it might work and what you would need to do to find reliable sources to support your additions. In more general terms, you could try the TEAHOUSE which is a part of the project designed to welcome new editors and get them started. Also, once I have finished this edit I will add a Welcome note above, which will have useful links in - these too can help you with policy and practices here. Please don't be discouraged - we have all had a go and been knocked back, and in the end it makes you a better editor! :) Best wishes DBaK (talk) 11:56, 27 March 2015 (UTC)