User talk:Brianhass/Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! D. J. Bracey (talk) 22:59, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

WNAX-FM
Hi Brian,

I notice you created the article on WNAX and various other radio related pages. I wonder if you have any more info about the station, no. of listeners, cross coverage in other media etc.? When creating a page its useful to include such info to verify it's notability other than it's own weblink. While established radio stations with a solid listener base are generally good for inclusion, WP is not an indiscriminate collection of information and it's important to make sure this is upheld. Good work on your contribs, you seem well motivated!  Dei z io  12:57, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
 * WNAX is probably one of the most significant radio stations in the mid-western part of the United States. WNAX is one of the oldest stations in the region; and, it is one of the best known radio stations in South Dakota.  While WNAX certainly has a solid listener base (since its signal has a large "footprint"), I do see a problem with using the number of listeners as a primary criteria for determining whether or not a radio station should be included on Wikipedia.  Areas like South Dakota tend to have a rather low population density; so, South Dakota radio stations would tend to have a lower number of listeners compared to radio stations on the east and west coasts of the United States.  This creates a bias on Wikipedia which tends to favor the more densely populated coasts.  South Dakota radio and TV stations can have a significant influence in the local region, even though the region has a lower population density.  With that being said, I do appreciate your comments.  Thank you!Brianhass (talk) 08:43, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

The Landlords
A tag has been placed on The Landlords, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please write  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, articles #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Missvain 06:21, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Nehemiah G. Ordway
The House SAA website states that Ordway's name was Nathanial, not Nehemiah. Since the source of this article is not cited, can you please confirm one way or another. Thanks, Daysleeper47 14:12, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I saw the reference to Nethanial Ordway on the House SAA website (and, I do believe the reference was to the same man); but, a Google search reveals a lot more search results for Nehemiah Ordway. There are numerous sources which list the man's first name as being "Nehemiah."  However, I do appreciate your input.Brianhass (talk) 08:21, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Fréquence Caribou
A tag has been placed on Fréquence Caribou, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on Talk:Fréquence Caribou. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. RJASE1 Talk  05:14, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Ken Hirsch (South Dakota)
I have added a "" template to the article Ken Hirsch (South Dakota), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Oo7565 02:17, 24 May 2007 (UTC)


 * It was unfortunate that the article on Ken Hirsch was deleted. Ken Hirsch was an icon in South Dakota television broadcasting for three decades; and, he was a popular figure who served as an announcer at many local air shows.  I realize that the Midwest is considered to be relatively unimportant to people from the east and west coasts; but, people in the Midwest do have their own local icons who are every bit as important to them as the regional icons on either of the coasts are to the people who live there.  When articles like this are deleted, it creates the impression that the Midwest does not matter, that there is no place for anything from the Midwest on Wikipedia.  Because of the sparse population density of the Midwest, people in that region lack the clout of the more densely populated coasts and tend to get outvoted.  Brianhass (talk) 08:45, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Fish Karma
A tag has been placed on Fish Karma requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Springnuts (talk) 22:15, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Fish Karma
An article that you have been involved in editing, Fish Karma, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you. Springnuts (talk) 22:06, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Tanka Bar
A tag has been placed on Tanka Bar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 01:49, 20 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The Tanka Bar article was not intended to be spam. There are many other products which have Wikipedia articles.  The Tanka Bar article was an honest effort to document a product which is made in South Dakota.  It is unfortunate that the article was tagged for speedy deletion.  Brianhass (talk) 08:50, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Liz Moses
An article that you have been involved in editing, Liz Moses, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Liz Moses. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Tevildo (talk) 18:44, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Doctor Who page
Hi, this off topic for Wikipedia but there's been a spat on http://ianlevine.forumco.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=2084&whichpage=3 about some of the information on your site regarding one of the episode recoverers who feels it portrays him unfavourably. He says he emailed you but got no response. Timrollpickering (talk) 13:18, 4 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Timrollpickering:


 * Thank you for informing me of of the spat on Ian Levine's website. To the best of my knowledge, I never received the email from the episode recoverer who felt that my article depicted him unfavorably.  The article was a research project, which I started on the internet in 1993; and, my sources were all cited.  I would certainly be interested in hearing from the episode recoverer if he wished to contact me.  I want to include all information in my article; so, any additional information which the recoverer could provide would be greatly appreciated.  If you are in contact with the episode recoverer, please let him know that nothing personal was intended and that I hope there are no hard feelings.


 * On the subject of Ian Levine's website, the article you mentioned was unavailable to me for viewing; because, I am not a member of the website. I applied for membership more than once in 2011; but, I never received confirmation.  Brianhass (talk) 08:32, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

No content in Category:Iowa television anchors
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Iowa television anchors, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Iowa television anchors has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Iowa television anchors, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 19:30, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Brianhass! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:47, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Michelle Miller -

Proposed deletion of The Landlords


The article The Landlords has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No indication of notability and no references provided to establish such

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kindzmarauli (talk) 19:22, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Margaret Gillespie (actress)


The article Margaret Gillespie (actress) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:ENT: No assertion of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.-- Shelf Skewed  Talk  17:53, 29 August 2010 (UTC)