User talk:BriceStratford

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * Welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style


 * Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or sock puppetry.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

Stamford Bull Run
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Stamford Bull Run, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.southkesteven.gov.uk/index.aspx?articleid=5563.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:04, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Stamford Bull Run
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Stamford Bull Run, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://ourheritagelincolnshire.weebly.com/stamford.html; https://web.archive.org/web/20140819082342/http://www.southkesteven.gov.uk/index.aspx?articleid=5563; who-knows-where else, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Stamford Bull Run and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Stamford Bull Run, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Stamford Bull Run. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Stamford Bull Run with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Stamford Bull Run saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:39, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Copyright investigation completed
Hello, BriceStratford. As you know from the notice above, this article was flagged for resemblance to external sites, including http://ourheritagelincolnshire.weebly.com/stamford.html. Investigation shows it was created as an unattributed split from Stamford, Lincolnshire, where the content was introduced to Wikipedia in 2009. This particular instance appears to be a backwards copy- explanation placed at the top of the original article's talk page.

The unattributed split is itself a copyright problem, although one that can be repaired. Content on Wikipedia is not public domain, but is liberally licensed for reuse. However, reusing it without meeting the terms of the license is not authorized. I have provided the necessary attribution for this instance. Please see Copying within Wikipedia for more information on how to do this in the future.

The article also included a lengthy, bald quotation from an external, copyrighted source. Wikipedia does accept quotations, but these must be brief and used transformatively - not simply because we wish to include the information. When information comes from a copyrighted source, or from a source we cannot verify is free licensed or public domain, we should put it in our own words aside from brief and clearly marked quotations used for good reasons, such as those set out at Non-free content policy and guideline. I have removed that content; you are welcome to include the information, but please put it in your own language. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:00, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:01, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

SPI
You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/BriceStratford. Thank you. Jytdog (talk) 19:34, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2023 - Adding COI report of over 30 disruptive accounts
I realize you haven't edited with this account in a while, but looking at the editing patterns of a handful of new accounts that are promoting your work, their editing patterns follow yours closely. Identically, actually. Though the tortuous SPI linked above, for some odd reason, did not wind up with your sockdrawer being blocked, other admins and I are revisiting this now that these spam-only accounts are disrupting the 'pedia. I am quite inclined to indef you along with all these spammers.

Quack
Admins and other Wikipedians in good standing, this is the pattern: A series of SPAs, gaming the system by avoiding overlaps. Edits up to warnings or blocks with one account, then abandons it and starts same pattern with new account. See the contribs for the clear pattern:

Author they were spamming for's COI account that has same editing pattern, suspected sockmaster: (Hasn't edited in years, leaning towards blocking on principle). This archived COI report: Conflict of Interest Noticeboard: Brice Stratford identified over 30 accounts in this COI sock/meat farm. I guess he laid low for a bit but is now back.

Recent accounts:


 * - spam account. Indeffed.
 * - this account created and began identical spam edits after Craneshore was warned about spamming.
 * - created some of the articles those accounts were spamming, same editing patterns.
 * - created Brice Stratford BLP for author they are spamming for.

- CorbieVreccan  ☊ ☼ 19:31, 17 April 2023 (UTC) Updated - CorbieVreccan  ☊ ☼ 20:09, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. - CorbieVreccan  ☊ ☼ 20:13, 21 April 2023 (UTC)