User talk:BrightCopperKettles3

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stephen J. R. Smith (September 29)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.


 * Draft:Stephen J. R. Smith may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:BrightCopperKettles3 Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Spicy&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:BrightCopperKettles3 reviewer's talk page] . or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spicy (talk) 14:05, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Stephen J. R. Smith


A tag has been placed on Draft:Stephen J. R. Smith requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/index.php/en/article/stephen-smith. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Spicy (talk) 14:06, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Stephen J. R. Smith


A tag has been placed on Stephen J. R. Smith requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/index.php/en/article/stephen-smith. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:21, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Stephen J. R. Smith


A tag has been placed on Stephen J. R. Smith, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/index.php/en/article/stephen-smith. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PRAXIDICAE🌈 14:43, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
Hello BrightCopperKettles3. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:BrightCopperKettles3. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. PRAXIDICAE🌈 15:26, 8 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Ah, I see. I am not being paid for the creation of this article, but I do work for a non-profit of which Stephen Smith is a Board Member. That said, he does seem to meet the criteria for inclusion in terms of people otherwise covered on Wikipedia - several articles that pre-existed this bio reference him (First National, Queens University, Stephen Smith School of Business).
 * I did not know about the "Articles for Creation" process (I saw only the "Publish this page" button), so perhaps that is the better approach for me on this one. Am I able to resubmit this piece through that process?
 * Thank you so much for your help! BrightCopperKettles3 (talk) 15:34, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * You have a conflict of interest and must disclose. PRAXIDICAE🌈 15:37, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you - I have done so on my user page. Do I need to do anything further to submit my article into the "Articles for Creation" process, or will that disclosure allow the article to remain? BrightCopperKettles3 (talk) 15:41, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * You may not copy content from elsewhere, it must be a summary of what independent reliable sources say so the article must be deleted. PRAXIDICAE🌈 15:42, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I do understand that. I just want to check though - this article that I have uploaded to Wikipedia was written from scratch, with independent sources all linked in the citations - it has 2 citations to The Canadian Encyclopedia (which is a reliable non-partisan source for information), but all else is from other places. We ran this article through a plagiarism checker online to ensure that it was not going to be considered a copy and it came back clean - is my connection going to make this article impossible to create?
 * Oh. I have just received a message that I am blocked from editing. Does a conflict of interest disclosed on my user page automatically cause a ban? BrightCopperKettles3 (talk) 15:53, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 15:48, 8 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi there,
 * I am not sure why I am flagged for advertising or promoting. I created a bio for a member of my board of directors - I did not know I needed to disclose a conflict of interest (my apologies), but have since done so. The bio is in keeping with the tone of other bios on Wikipedia, is about a person who meets the criteria of inclusion based on other bios included on the site (he is referenced in a number of other articles that pre-existed this bio).
 * Other than this bio, my edits have been to update articles about our programs and to correct errors of fact - not to boast, but to make corrections to claims like "Heritage Minutes used to be called "Moments in Time"", which was never true. That is not promotion, it is monitoring accuracy. BrightCopperKettles3 (talk) 16:01, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * BrightCopperKettles3
 * BrightCopperKettles3 (talk) 16:34, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * BrightCopperKettles3
 * BrightCopperKettles3 (talk) 16:34, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * BrightCopperKettles3
 * BrightCopperKettles3 (talk) 16:34, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * BrightCopperKettles3 (talk) 16:34, 8 July 2022 (UTC)