User talk:Brightestandbest

Essential Foods ‎
Hi. As a start, can I ask what role you have in regard to Essential Foods ? Looking at all those very promotional articles you created on the different Wikipedias, my hunch is that you have some sort of economical interest or are employed in the company. In that case, please read Conflict of interest and Notability very carefully.

As to the article on question, I think the main problem is that you try to describe both the firm, the animal food and the founder at the same time. What is the main focus? Promoting the firm or the dogfood?

I would focus on the firm, but I can't say if the firm is relevant enough for an article. I'm not that much into the criteria here on the english Wikipedia, so I'll leave that to the "locals".

Regards Knud Winckelmann (talk) 20:03, 18 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the advice. I see that the Royal Canin article has not been flagged as promotional. I will revise my article to mirror that one. If that's not an acceptable strategy, please let me know.--Brightestandbest (talk) 15:23, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Essential Foods logo.svg
Thanks for uploading File:Essential Foods logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 1 July 2019 (UTC)