User talk:Brightfire4

Complete replacement of article
Please see my reply to your Help desk query, here. (Normally I would not respond on a user's talk page like this. But that thread is due to be archived soon, and you may be unfamiliar with the archiving process, so I am writing here to ensure you know that there is a recent response.) Maproom (talk) 21:46, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Article on Cass theory
Hi, Brightfire4! I just wanted to make a comment on the article you were working on, which you were concerned someone might rewrite.

One of the things I found most interesting is that you pointed out that all other psych articles you'd checked had presented those psychologists' theories correctly. This is true even though anyone can edit Wikipedia. That's kind of the beauty of Wikipedia -- if something is wrong on it, eventually someone will come along, realize it's wrong, and fix it. So if you write an article here on Wikipedia, you don't have to worry that someone will come along and rewrite it incorrectly. That is, they might...but then you or some other editor will see what they did and revert. When you write an article, you've automatically added that article to your 'watchlist' -- that means that every time anyone does ANYTHING to that article, you get a notification. That's how we keep all those other articles correct once we get them correct -- any number of people will have that article in their watchlist, too, and when someone comes along and changes something, often multiple editors will go check it out to make sure it's not something that introduces anything incorrect into the article or something unsourced. I hope this helps. valereee (talk) 14:32, 23 July 2015 (UTC)