User talk:Brightside106

Emma Harrison
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Emma Harrison (entrepreneur), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Bladeboy1889 (talk) 14:16, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Another Warning
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Emma Harrison (entrepreneur), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you.

Raised at administrators noticeboard
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

October 2013
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing, as you did at Emma Harrison (entrepreneur). If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. m.o.p 14:49, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks Bishonen

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Emma Harrison (entrepreneur), without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. m.o.p 16:02, 29 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Yes, I'm becoming a little worried about my unblock, Brightside. You know, these edits that Master of Puppets mentions,, which were reverted as unsourced, aren't just unsourced, they're far too detailed, too promotional, too celebratory. Please familiarize yourself with the principles for encyclopedic biographies. Add only encyclopedic information, in a neutral tone. Bishonen &#124; talk 16:28, 29 October 2013 (UTC).

I've just added some new content which I believe is sourced and verified correctly. Can you please confirm that this is acceptable Bishonen and Master of Puppets so that I know what is suitable in future.


 * Not quite. Please look at the way the other two honorary doctorates are mentioned. There's no call for a separate entry quoting the university's praise, which can appropriately be read in the linked source, and you shouldn't introduce a "narrative" tone by leading with the date (is the date important?). Also I don't understand what the footnote to Thirdsector is doing there. It's from 2010, and it doesn't mention the doctorate (which is from 2008), so how is it a source for it? Thank you for the information, and I'll edit your addition to illustrate what I mean. Bishonen &#124; talk 16:48, 29 October 2013 (UTC).

Ok thanks Bishonen. It may take me some time to get the hang of this but please bear with me.