User talk:Briginna

October 2023
Hello, I'm 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Cam Newton, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 05:31, 2 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Absolutely all the info I cited are Total facts. At the time,I did the improvements, I wasn’t aware, I had to do it as such. I will try to do better. I’m still learning! Thank u for understanding my response! Briginna (talk) 22:11, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Cam Newton, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Larry Hockett (Talk) 09:16, 2 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you! Im trying to follow rules. I’ve also not included absolutely no false or made up content. I want to do it as required. All the info I wrote prior is valid, & in a lot of sources, newspaper, Radio, TV, Pff, Stat records, NFL Reports, articles, etc. I will try to do it sonmuch better, too! Briginna (talk) 22:07, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. signed, Willondon (talk) 15:30, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. signed, Willondon (talk) 22:10, 2 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The information I added was based on the actual occurrence of what happened. Everything I reported is facts and not made up. I didn’t know I had to list all that. I follow him daily as a fan, I have given no false information whatsoever. I have absolutely no reason to want to do it. I have it logged in my mind. The info is cited in too many sources to claim in Wikipedia. I wasn’t told for my edits it had to list where it came from. I hate I got locked out for this. Thank u anyway, though! Briginna (talk) 01:47, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:24, 2 October 2023 (UTC)


 * I think I shouldn’t have been blocked. I have no reason to lie! I’m a fan. I follow him everyday. I have nothing to gain to report anything false to u. The only thing I really did was include additional context to already existing information. But, thank u anyway! Briginna (talk) 01:53, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Cam Newton, you may be blocked from editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:51, 4 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Sir, it’s not my personal opinions at all. I have no reason to do that. I’m very sorry u feel it was my intent. I’m doing everything in my power to follow the rules. I’ve tried to put the sources into the material as much as I could. I read through other athletes and similar material was in theirs. The info I added were in articles, radio, web sites, etc. I hope u receive this honest response from me. Thank u for understanding. Briginna (talk) 21:34, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
 * P. S. To: Josh
 * Every single thing I submitted is true. Also, I consulted other athletes and the same, likes I added, was in theirs. Thank u in advance for accepting my explanation. I have nothing to gain from including the work that he actually did, & has done. Briginna (talk) 21:42, 4 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Nuvola apps important.svg You must provide a reliable source for statements introduced into Wikipedia. Facts may be true, or opinions may be based on true facts, but unless a secondary source reports on them, they are not necessarily noteworthy. Stop adding original research and/or unsourced content to articles as you did again at Cam Newton.   signed, Willondon (talk)  00:16, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:17, 6 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Mr Radish, everything I gave is facts. The work was done by the athlete. I have no reason to turn in a false report to Wikipedia. I have nothing to gain trying to do anything wrong. If u look it up, before blocking me, u would see I’m
 * being honest. U told me to present facts. I did it. And u still go over it & on top of it to block out the work after I researched and included missing items. It hurt u keep on blocking me saying I’m disruptive. I’m not.
 * But, it’s ur decision not to list the facts I presented ongoing, then, it’s nothing else I can do. Please know, I was enhancing work done. Not lying about nothing. Be blessed. 🙏💕 Briginna (talk) 07:59, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
 * (P.S.)
 * The post I put in is 592 Rushing yards. The work is done by the athlete. I can’t understand why it’s constant rejected to be published, by you as the Editor.
 * Many other athletes have their rushing yards listed. Why is it called disruptive? If it’s false, I can understand it. But, it’s really real. The Rushing yards are real, and located in various documents. I’ve not made anything up, at all! Adding his 592 Rushing yards is very useful to his body of work. Thank u for considering my work as authentic! Briginna (talk) 12:36, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mac Jones. ––– GMH Melbourne 11:51, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:07, 19 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Mr Finnish, everything I list is facts.
 * It’s concerning u continue to do this.
 * Why would I lie? What is there for me to gain?
 * Anyways, we’re told we can edit for clarity. If a person does the work, why must it be blocked and prevented, ongoing, by u constantly?
 * Well, ur decision is made. Be blessed! 🙏💕 Briginna (talk) 01:30, 20 October 2023 (UTC)