User talk:Brimrād Genga

February 2013
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to History of England, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.  Dr Greg  talk  22:14, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Genetic history of the English

I presume you are responsible for creating the content under question, either directly typed or copied and pasted from a source. I removed it because of two reasons. #1: Your lack of a reference for Tacitus. That's a whole lot of questionable info on 'the Briton's of England' you put there. #2: The whole segment is placed at a very inconvenient point between 'Later Prehistory' and 'Roman Britain'. Please try to maintain the connection between 'England' and the 'English People', who did not become a defined ethnic group until later in the first millenia AD. Thank You. Brimrād Genga.


 * No, I didn't create this, but I am not a mind reader. When I see information deleted without an explanation given in the edit summary, I have little choice but to assume it's vandalism, whether it really is or not. If you give a reason for deleting material, then other editors can assess if your reason seems valid or not, but without a reason, we are stuck. If you give convincing reasons for deletion in the future, your actions won't be undone.


 * I suggest what you do next is to copy your explanation above to Talk:History of England and then the other editors who are watching that talk page can decide whether they agree with your reasoning. It sounds plausible to me but I am not an expert in this area. Best wishes --  Dr Greg   talk  23:24, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

My apologies then. I am new to the interactive side of Wiki and deleted the content on a few occasions to draw attention from the responsible individual/party. Thank You. Brimrād Genga.