User talk:Bringshalom22

October 2012
Hello, I'm Avriette. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page Messianic Bible translations, because it seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. ... aa:talk 00:11, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors&#32; according to your reverts at Messianic Bible translations. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. 22:46, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you are asking for, as I simply followed the format of all the other Messianic Bible translations with a link to the website (as the others do). This Messianic translation has been in print for two years now and continues to be published, and believe the only reason this edit is continuaosly being removed is that it is a free Messianic translation, which threatens those who are making a profit off their translations. Could you pleas clarify what needs to be done to keep this Bible listed amonst the other Messianic Bibles. Thank you so much.

Please stop edit-warring at Messianic Bible translations
Hi, Bringshalom22. You are continuing to edit-war at Messianic Bible translations to insert an entry without a reliable secondary source indicating it is a noteworthy Messianic bible translation. You need to bring a source for this. If you continue to simply try to add the content every few days without providing a source, an edit-warring report may be opened about this incident, and you may be blocked from editing for it. Please bring an independent reliable secondary source demonstrating that the content you are trying to add is indeed a Messianic bible translation. Thank you... 21:17, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you are asking for, as I simply followed the format of all the other Messianic Bible translations with a link to the website (as the others do). This Messianic translation has been in print for two years now and continues to be published, and believe the only reason this edit is continuaosly being removed is that it is a free Messianic translation, which threatens those who are making a profit off their translations. Could you pleas clarify what needs to be done to keep this Bible listed amonst the other Messianic Bibles. Thank you so much.

Hello. Can you kindly get back to me about this situation. Thank you


 * Sorry I didn't reply earlier. You need to provide an independent reliable secondary source that mentions HalleluYah Scriptures and describes it as a Messianic bible translation and indicates that it is at least minimally noteworthy.  I see you have added it back again.  It is at risk of being removed again.  You need to stop adding it back in again until you can provide an independent reliable secondary source as described.  Continually adding it back without discussion or addressing the concerns raised is called edit-warring and it can get you blocked.  Please stop doing it.   03:53, 12 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Please stop adding the HalleluYah Scriptures until you can provide a reliable source that indicates it is a Messianic translation. The next time you insert the HalleluYah Scriptures without such a source, you will be blocked. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 04:28, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Please tell me where to add this? as no one else in the list has done this not one. A person has done a professioina video on the translation and over 36,000 have been printed and shipped around the world. What else do you need. There is many of us around the world that think this is important as it is free. Can you let me know how to add this link. Here is the link about the translation http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjD5f_rzwUo thank you

Can you give examples - here are the other people who have listed and not one of them as any backing or references or independent or reliable source. The video above has mention Jerusalem Universarty checking the translation out and agreed it was the purest and closest to the Hebrew than any other version in English. Thank you and can you reply as soon as possible as I never heard from from you so through it was fine to put back up. Thanks

The Scriptures (TS98) The Scriptures (TS98/ISR), first published in 1998 by the Institute for Scripture Research of South Africa, is used by some assemblies.[citation needed] It follows a literal style of translation incorporating many Hebrew character and place names, and also employs the Hebrew tetragrammaton for God's name.[3] [edit] The Living Scriptures, 1982 The Living Scripture is an adaptation of the Living Bible done by David Bronstein, published in 1982. In it, "Jesus" is written as "Yeshua", "Christ" as "Messiah", "John" as "Yohanan", etc.[citation needed] [edit] The Orthodox Jewish Bible The Orthodox Jewish Bible, completed by Philip Goble in 2002,[4] is a paraphrase that applies Yiddish and Hasidic cultural expressions to the Messianic Bible. [edit] The Aramaic English New Testament The Aramaic English New Testament (AENT) published by Netzari Press in 2008 is a translation based on the Aramaic New Testament of the Peshitta rather than Greek versions of the New Testament. It uses many Hebraic terms, and is very apologetic towards Torah observance in its commentary.[5]


 * Do you understand what a Messianic Bible translation is? Is there any indication that the HalleluYah Scriptures is a Messianic translation? — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 04:43, 12 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Adding to what Malik said: One entry in the list, Stern's Complete Jewish Bible, is discussed in a book by Bruce Metzger.  Here is a link to the entry:  link.  In this entry, the translation is mentioned, and Metzger describes the target audience for the translation as "Messianic Jews."  So, this is a good example of an independent (Metzger is not associated with Stern), reliable secondary source (it's a source analyzing the translation), and it identifies the translation and says it is for Messianic Jews.  This is what you need to find.  Some of the other entries in the list do not have this and honestly those are problems too, they also need sources.    04:53, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

This is what I did. Also having the Father and His Son's Name in Paleo Hebrew is a very good indication it is Messianic, it has more Hebrew words in the translation that no other version has. It is all over the HalleluYah Scritpures web site and only Messianic's order the edition. ISR does not have any references and neither does the Aramaic edition. It is stated on the HS site that it is a Messianic bible. Can you let me know what these two people did that is different. Thank you so much for your help.

Hello,

I am a Messianic Jew and so are many that I fellowship with around the world. We use this bible. There is many web sites that has this bible on there and they are Messianic. So totally unsure what else to write. Thank you and can the other peoples listings be removed also as it is not fair. Thank you

These two people have their own site as a source and they should be removed as well. Do you think so? Thank you for your help The Scriptures (TS98) The Scriptures (TS98/ISR), first published in 1998 by the Institute for Scripture Research of South Africa, is used by some assemblies.[citation needed] It follows a literal style of translation incorporating many Hebrew character and place names, and also employs the Hebrew tetragrammaton for God's name.[3]

The Aramaic English New Testament The Aramaic English New Testament (AENT) published by Netzari Press in 2008 is a translation based on the Aramaic New Testament of the Peshitta rather than Greek versions of the New Testament. It uses many Hebraic terms, and is very apologetic towards Torah observance in its commentary.[5] HERE IS A LINK AND VIDEO ON THE HALLELUYAH SCRIPTURES TRANSLATION, this is an independent person. How do we put this link into the listings as an independent review. Published on May 9, 2012 by WatchAlan Learn all about the HalleluYah Scriptures Messianic Bible and why it is the superior Restored Name Translation of His Word. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjD5f_rzwUo


 * OK I am glad that you seem to be getting at least part of the message--that you need to provide a source that describes the translation as Messianic. However, the YouTube video isn't acceptable.  It appears to be an advertisement for the translation, and so would not be independent.  Also, the creator of the video cannot be confirmed to be a reliable source.  WatchAlan appears to be a guitarist, and does not appear to have any credentials as an academic religious scholar.  In contrast, Bruce Metzger was a Ph.D. from Princeton University.  You need to find an independent reliable secondary source supporting that the translation is an (at least minimally) noteworthy Messianic translation.  Thanks...   15:34, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

So this needs to be removed as well right? The Aramaic English New Testament The Aramaic English New Testament (AENT) published by Netzari Press in 2008 is a translation based on the Aramaic New Testament of the Peshitta rather than Greek versions of the New Testament. It uses many Hebraic terms, and is very apologetic towards Torah observance in its commentary.[4]


 * I'd say that in that list of 4 named translations, only Stern has a sufficient source. The other three do not have independent reliable secondary sourcing, and someone should find sources for them before they are challenged and removed--all three could be removed at this point as unsourced.  One is entirely unsourced, the other are sourced only to the websites selling the books, and that is not satisfactory sourcing by Wikipedia standards.  My only involvement here is from preventing a list of poorly-sourced items from getting any larger, and trying to prevent the current problem with WP:NOT from getting any worse.    22:11, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Use edit summaries, explain what you are doing and why
Hi Bringshalom, I see you reverted again. You really need to start using edit summaries and explaining what you are doing and why. If you do so, other editors might see you have a good reason for your edits and not revert them. It's always best to have good communication... without an explanation why you removed those Bibles again, Pete (or someone else) could very well put them back, and you'll find you have wasted some time! Cheers. 05:44, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Not sure what you mean by this. Another person said that all those listings need to come off as they do not have references like the one I put so only fair that they come down. It is not fair if all can be put up when the listing I put up was removed. Thank you