User talk:Briningyouthetruth

December 2012
Hello, I'm Theroadislong. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Somaliland, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 14:15, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

I have re added the paragraph. I believe that you have made a mistake because i believe that Wikipedia articles should bring both side of this story. I believe that page needs immideate editing because it is too biased. in another world not 100% the truth. Indeed this is a pitty.

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Somaliland, without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Gyrofrog (talk) 15:14, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Siad Barre, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. --   LuK3      (Talk)   17:13, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Somaliland. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --   LuK3      (Talk)   17:17, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Somaliland, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''I'll also direct you to No personal attacks. I'm not Ethiopian, and I don't see what difference it would make - your edits simply lack sources.'' Gyrofrog (talk) 01:42, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Somaliland shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Gyrofrog (talk) 03:41, 9 December 2012 (UTC)


 * It is evident that you have used the account Chocolatebar101 (talk · contribs) to circumvent the WP:3RR rule.  (Technically, you were already in violation at the time of the 3RR warning:, , , ) -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 17:49, 9 December 2012 (UTC)