User talk:Britney-xxo

Please sign your messages with ~ ~  ~  ~(without the spaces), as it signs both your username and a timestamp.

Firegirl65
The article Firegirl65 has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Merope 08:28, 25 March 2007 (UTC)


 * This page does not assert the notability of its subject. If you disagree with its deletion, you may request a deletion review.  -- Merope 08:39, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

WP:DRV
Please do not resubmit this article. If you disagree with its deletion, you may request a deletion review. Continuing to submit the article can result in your being blocked from editing. -- Merope 08:53, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Why I deleted it
The article makes no assertion of the subject's notability--that is, why it should be included in an encyclopedia. Anyone can upload a video to YouTube. If you can provide reliable sources (that is, something other than YouTube or MySpace) that document this person's notability, then it might be worthy of inclusion. If not, then it's subject to deletion. -- Merope 08:57, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's still not enough. We need something that actually addresses why she's notable.  I could go upload videos of myself to a dozen websites right now, but it doesn't mean I should have an entry in an encyclopedia.  Please read the policies I've linked above to get a better understanding of our criteria.  -- Merope 09:04, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I admit that it's very sad, but unless you can provide reliable sources that document the event, it's not worthy of an encyclopedia entry. Even if it has been covered in the media, it still may not be notable.  -- Merope 09:12, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
 * And that's certainly a good thing to do, but Wikipedia isn't the place for it. Perhaps you can start your own website or create a listing on MySpace or Facebook.  -- Merope 09:16, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

March 2007
All contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Merope may be offensive or unwelcome. In case you are the user, please login under that account and proceed to make the changes. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do, particularly to userpages. Take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- Hdt83 Chat 03:44, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Merope; this is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Kesac 03:45, 29 March 2007 (UTC)