User talk:BrittanyPBone

--BrittanyPBone (talk) 21:25, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jimmy Comet


A tag has been placed on Jimmy Comet requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Unsourced redirect to a nonsense name

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 23:14, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

BLP Discretionary Sanctions alert
NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 23:16, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

BrittanyPBone, you are invited to the Teahouse!

 * Thanks, I'll check it out.--BrittanyPBone (talk) 16:21, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
Your recent editing history at Richard B. Spencer shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 18:44, 27 January 2017 (UTC)