User talk:Brittanybonilla/sandbox

Great deal of bias and overrepresentation in "Gender Identity"
The article on "Gender Identity" has many bias opinions in regards to how biology influences gender identity. First and foremost, the author mainly supports the idea that social factors such as traditional family standards, parental demand, surgical procedures, and even what we choose to play with at a young age. The author then addresses opposing viewpoints as "some may.."or "in some situations", simply expressing that only a portion of the community undergo certain circumstances. In addition, the author over-represents its references to John Money and his studies, even if they are proven to be discredited. Social environmental factors. Although there many sources from different scientists, the writer seems to have a certain interest with John Money's work because they constantly refer back to his findings. This obviously creates that sense of favorable bias in which could block the accurate findings for this article. Lastly, the author title-although is straightforward- should include the presenting of factors that correlate to gender identity. Not just introducing "gender identity" itself. Brittanybonilla (talk) 06:30, 26 October 2016 (UTC)