User talk:Brittny Eaddy/sandbox

Zachary S peer review
Your article seems very well organized and put together. Aside from a handful of questionable choices in wording, I saw no structural or informational issues with your work. Your point of view seems neutral and consistent, and your information seems well researched and organized. Overall, great work and a significant contribution to the main article. Zachary Sparacio (talk) 04:31, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Clifford M peer review
While source 1 links to the correct source in the list of sources, for some reason, it isn't displayed correctly in the list of sources. It has a number 1 with nothing besides it. I also believe this causes a number shift in the list, because source 3 is talked about in your second sentence in which you cite source 2. Otherwise, great information. Clifford mcgraw (talk) 17:07, 15 October 2019 (UTC)